2007
DOI: 10.1136/gut.2005.089813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma may develop within a background of accumulating DNA methylation in normal and dysplastic mucosa

Abstract: Background: Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) often arises from preceding dysplastic lesions in the oesophageal epithelium. However, the molecular changes occurring in premalignant lesions are not well understood. An epigenetic change is an example of OSCC that may occur within the epithelium. Aim: To investigate the methylation status of multiple promoters in cancer-derived DNA, as well as in the background epithelium of OSCC, including dysplastic lesions and non-neoplastic mucosa. The normal epithel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

10
45
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
10
45
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Mutations of p53 or p53 oncoprotein are relatively late events in carcinogenesis (42,43), so, despite their biological plausibility as cancer predictors, they are insufficient for risk assessments for SCC in the UADT. Because aberrant DNA methylation usually precedes neoplastic transformation, qualitative studies have suggested that the presence of methylated genes may increase in a sequence from normal mucosa to precursor lesions to SCC (44)(45)(46). Our study further found that this phenomenon is quantitative for individual gene markers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Mutations of p53 or p53 oncoprotein are relatively late events in carcinogenesis (42,43), so, despite their biological plausibility as cancer predictors, they are insufficient for risk assessments for SCC in the UADT. Because aberrant DNA methylation usually precedes neoplastic transformation, qualitative studies have suggested that the presence of methylated genes may increase in a sequence from normal mucosa to precursor lesions to SCC (44)(45)(46). Our study further found that this phenomenon is quantitative for individual gene markers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Based on a panel of 14 promoter loci, it has recently been reported that nonneoplastic epithelium from patients with ESCC is significantly more methylated than control esophageal epithelium from healthy volunteers, and that this may contribute to progression in the dysplasia-carcinoma sequence in ESCC (30). Similarly, in the current study, AKAP12 hypermethylation was significantly higher in NEcA than in NE or NEcS, whereas no such trend was observed for NEcS versus NE.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 38%
“…Previous studies have shown the importance of hypermethylation of gene promoters in histologically normal tissue as this event relates to the initiation of carcinoma (25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30). By methylation-specific in situ PCR and in situ RNA and protein analysis, methylation of the MLH1 promoter was observed in small foci of normal colonic epithelial cells from patients with colon cancer and associated silencing of this gene, but not in sections of normal colon from healthy volunteers, suggesting that tumors with gene silencing due to epigenetic alteration may evolve from rare clones of methylated cells in normal epithelium (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportions of positive cells were evaluated using the scoring system to determine as negative (-) to extremely strong positive (++++) staining. 30 Kuroki et al also showed high methylation frequency for RAR-β in non-tumor esophageal samples, 23 and a recent study indicated that smoking-damaged esophageal epithelium, even histologically normal, had suffered epigenetic changes. 27 Thus, our data suggest that the methylated alleles in the paired non-tumor tissues may represent premalignant changes and p16, CDH1, DAPK and RAR-β may be of the possible targets for predicting cancer risk and/or making an early cancer diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%