Of a complex sensitivity in marketing ethics education

Abstract

Copyright 2011 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.This paper scrutinises the way in which ethics is taught in the modern marketing syllabus. Our intention is to open up a space within which to promote timely debate on contemporary marketing education. Specifically, we wish to ask whether the tutor's role as a conduit of apparent ethical knowledge to students has somehow failed to map with sufficient sensitivity the terrain of the moral impulse in business practice. Drawing on literature from educational philosophy and the work of Emmanuel Levinas, we argue that the conceptualisation of ethics in marketing cannot be divorced from the question of pedagogy and the responsibilities of the tutor. This reading of ethics in marketing leads us to suggest that the largely conventional model adopted for the teaching of marketing may be unsatisfactory. Whilst current approaches may provide students with a prescribed set of knowledge and skills, it may by the same token refuse us the moral education that seems to be necessary. The significance for the teaching of ethics in an atmosphere punctuated with the discourses of economic crisis is acknowledged. We call for a reappraisal of the tutor/student relationship such that we may facilitate a greater understanding of how marketing students can make sense of themselves and of 'the Other'. To begin the process of articulation, we offer an example drawn from nursing education. Through this, we consider the requirements of the capable moral educator and offer initial practical suggestions on how this could be incorporated within teachin

Moving from Marketization to Marketing of Higher Education: The Co-Creation of Value in Higher Education

“…These authors view current ethics teaching as "token" and question whether teachers truly recognize their role in mapping the terrain of moral impulse in business for their students. They conclude that concern for "the Other" has been displaced by business philosophy of reason, calculation, and an identity of "same" (Brennan et al, 2010).…”

“…Brennan, Eagle, Ellis, and Higgins (2010) argue that the conventional model for teaching ethics in college business courses is unsatisfactory. These authors view current ethics teaching as "token" and question whether teachers truly recognize their role in mapping the terrain of moral impulse in business for their students.…”

Answering Levinas' Call in Organization Studies

“…Levinas' radical approach to ethics problematizes and challenges some taken-for-granted assumptions, particularly in the field of business ethics. In fact, it has already been used to shed new light on management (Bevan and Corvellec, 2007), marketing (Desmond, 2007), accounting (Campbell et al, 2009), business education (Brennan et al, 2010), Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) (Becker, 2013) and diversity management issues (Muhr, 2008;Bruna, Tchankam and Yanat, 2016). Mostly, however, it has been used to renew thought on business ethics (Painter-Morland, 2010;Becker, 2013) and organizational justice issues (Aasland, 2007).…”

An Overview of Research on Marketing Ethics Education

“…Ethical education should help to build the responsibility for the conduct in business and the ability to discern right from wrong, ethical from unethical (Ruiz, 2004). Some academicians perceive marketing as a more economical and empirical discipline (Brennan, Nick & Higgins, 2010 argues that economics students especially are lacking philosophical thinking to be applied in understanding abstract ethical principles and that they are considered quite ignorant as regards ethical theories. However, according to Spain and others (2005), this ignorance can be reversed by the application of appropriate teaching methods, including case studies, lectures, assignments, and discussions.…”