1996
DOI: 10.2307/3107114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
161
0
38

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
161
0
38
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the information practices literature, information tools are viewed as sociotechnical constructs and are defined as “artefacts for creating, recording, organizing, storing, manipulating, and sharing information” (Nathan, 2012, p. 2256, citing Kling et al, 2005). Information systems, on the other hand, is a broader label for “the complicated array of social and cultural practices and the political and technical infrastructures required for information tools to ‘work’” (Nathan, 2012, p. 2256, citing Bijker, 1995; Latour, 1992; Suchman, 1987). Information practices can emerge from “our interactions with information tools,” by becoming “identifiable, discernable patterns of behavior,” and these tools and practices are “heavily interdependent” (Nathan, 2012, p. 2256).…”
Section: Surveillance As Information Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the information practices literature, information tools are viewed as sociotechnical constructs and are defined as “artefacts for creating, recording, organizing, storing, manipulating, and sharing information” (Nathan, 2012, p. 2256, citing Kling et al, 2005). Information systems, on the other hand, is a broader label for “the complicated array of social and cultural practices and the political and technical infrastructures required for information tools to ‘work’” (Nathan, 2012, p. 2256, citing Bijker, 1995; Latour, 1992; Suchman, 1987). Information practices can emerge from “our interactions with information tools,” by becoming “identifiable, discernable patterns of behavior,” and these tools and practices are “heavily interdependent” (Nathan, 2012, p. 2256).…”
Section: Surveillance As Information Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dominant social groups that also contribute to patterning of technological development are firms, institutions, policy-makers, users, special interest groups, etc. [78,79]. Each of these groups is both independent and interacting with each other, but on the other hand, because they have their own distinctive features and environment, they have relative autonomy.…”
Section: Multi-level Perspective As Analytical Framework For Energy Management In Smesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because, despite the good intentions of R&D teams, and the relevance of the proposals, developing and implementing technologies for social inclusion is far from easy. The survey and analysis of experiences from Argentina and Brazil clearly show that many of them have been discontinued, or have caused significant undesirable effects, while many of them have failed (see for example: [43], [44], [45]. 8 According to these authors, the biggest problem may be summarised as what might be called -specificintervention technologies‖.…”
Section: Problem 2: the Performance Of -Technologies For Social Inclu...mentioning
confidence: 99%