2017
DOI: 10.1080/14649365.2016.1275754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Of place’ or ‘of people’: exploring the animal spaces and beastly places of feral cats in southern Ontario

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, Crist argued that a denial of animal minds leads more broadly to environmental destruction by humans: “As animals became successfully represented in dominant discourses as devoid of agency and experiential perspective—thereby becoming construable as a means for human ends—a fortiori the (apparently) nonsentient domains of forests, rivers, meadows, oceans, deserts, and mountains (in fact, of any landscape or seascape) were made accessible to the human race without accountability or restriction” [27] (p. 46). As such, there have been several calls by critical animal scholars, including animal geographers, to attend to the inner lives, experiences, and worldviews of animals [37,38]. Animal geographers attempt to highlight animals’ roles in human societies and identities, and in particular, their subjectivities, and their agency as beings with inner thought and intentionality [39,40,41].…”
Section: Animal Geographymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, Crist argued that a denial of animal minds leads more broadly to environmental destruction by humans: “As animals became successfully represented in dominant discourses as devoid of agency and experiential perspective—thereby becoming construable as a means for human ends—a fortiori the (apparently) nonsentient domains of forests, rivers, meadows, oceans, deserts, and mountains (in fact, of any landscape or seascape) were made accessible to the human race without accountability or restriction” [27] (p. 46). As such, there have been several calls by critical animal scholars, including animal geographers, to attend to the inner lives, experiences, and worldviews of animals [37,38]. Animal geographers attempt to highlight animals’ roles in human societies and identities, and in particular, their subjectivities, and their agency as beings with inner thought and intentionality [39,40,41].…”
Section: Animal Geographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compassionate conservation and animal geography, a sub-discipline of human geography, share two important foundational tenets: (1) both bodies of scholarship developed as a response to the ethical and political responsibilities we hold toward the animals we share our world with [42,44]; and (2) both bodies of scholarship seek to ensure that (individual) animals’ needs are not simply ignored or unthinkingly placed below humans’ needs [7,15,44]. However, animal geography also moves beyond these anthropocentric concerns and attempts to understand the lives of animals in and of themselves, not only as individuals, but as beings who have lived experiences and agency [37,38,43,45,46]. Animal geography is therefore well-positioned to contribute to extending the field of compassionate conservation by highlighting these aspects.…”
Section: Animal Geographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vital relations and contingent differences comprising actual ways of living – what Thom van Dooren terms “flight ways” () – are excluded from any such biopolitical reckoning with environmental destruction. Writing within the environmental humanities (Rose et al., ) as well as geography (see Van Patter & Hovorka, , p. 291) has challenged species essentialism and concomitant conservation discourses of the “greater good.” Increasingly, “species” – as atomised units of concern and a “concrete phenomenon of nature” (Mayr, , p. 263) – become “unthinkable” within posthumanism's rhizomatic ontologies (Haraway, , p. 57; Whatmore, ).…”
Section: Extinction Culture and More‐than‐human Geographiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although methodological and conceptual developments have favoured the former (Hodgetts & Lorimer, 2015), there is growing energy within more-than-human geography to explore the spatial character of animal life beyond its "placing" by humans (Buller, 2014(Buller, , 2015Johnston, 2008;H. Lorimer, 2006;Lorimer et al, 2017;Van Patter & Hovorka, 2018). Animals, figured as "geographers too" (Buller, 2015, p. 380), enact spatial lives and attachments.…”
Section: More-than-human Cultural Geographiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation