2021
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab1273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Off-axis jet scenario for early afterglow emission of low-luminosity gamma-ray burst GRB 190829A

Abstract: Recently, ground-based Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes have reported the detection of very-high-energy (VHE) gamma-rays from some gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). One of them, GRB 190829A, was triggered by the Swift satellite, and about 2 × 104 s after the burst onset the VHE gamma-ray emission was detected by H.E.S.S. with ∼5σ significance. This event had unusual features of having much smaller isotropic equivalent gamma-ray energy than typical long GRBs and achromatic peaks in X-ray and optical afterglow at… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of detectable optical polarization allows us to disfavor emission from a misaligned jet with θ v 2θ jet (e.g. Sato et al 2021), indicating that viewing angle effects can not explain the bright and delayed peak observed at optical and X-ray wavelengths. Our study of the multi-color light curves and broadband SEDs favors a forward shock plus reverse shock model (Rhodes et al 2020;Salafia et al 2021) in which the early afterglow peak is powered by the reverse shock emission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The lack of detectable optical polarization allows us to disfavor emission from a misaligned jet with θ v 2θ jet (e.g. Sato et al 2021), indicating that viewing angle effects can not explain the bright and delayed peak observed at optical and X-ray wavelengths. Our study of the multi-color light curves and broadband SEDs favors a forward shock plus reverse shock model (Rhodes et al 2020;Salafia et al 2021) in which the early afterglow peak is powered by the reverse shock emission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also indicate that a slow component with a soft spectrum is dominating the signal. This could be ascribed to viewing angle effects (Sato et al 2021), thermal emission from the photosphere (Vetere et al 2006;Zhang & Yan 2011) or the cocoon break-out.…”
Section: Prompt Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The inference on the afterglow parameters described so far is based on the assumption of an on-axis viewing angle. On the other hand, a slightly off-axis viewing angle could explain the relatively low luminosity and low peak energy of the observed prompt emission (Sato et al 2021). This would imply, however, some degree of proper motion in the VLBI images (Fernández et al 2021), which can be tested, in principle, with our observations.…”
Section: Viewing Angle Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%