2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Off-design performance of an organic Rankine-vapor compression cooling cycle using R1234ze(E)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Equation (27), i is the interest rate (10%) and n is the expected life of the system (20 years) [50]. The total system cost rate of the designed system is calculated by summing the total capital investment cost, the total exergy destruction cost and the cost of the lost exergy (Equation ( 28)) [51].…”
Section: Ex In Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Equation (27), i is the interest rate (10%) and n is the expected life of the system (20 years) [50]. The total system cost rate of the designed system is calculated by summing the total capital investment cost, the total exergy destruction cost and the cost of the lost exergy (Equation ( 28)) [51].…”
Section: Ex In Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They observed that the thermal COP was 0.66. Gauberger et al [27] also reported the off-design performance of the their system. They stated that increasing the driving heat source inlet temperature improved the COP of the system and the thermal efficiency of the ORC power cycle, while decreasing the efficiency of the compressor and the COP of the VCR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%