2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00592-019-01386-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Off-label prescription of SGLT-2 inhibitors to patients with type 1 diabetes: an online survey of diabetes specialists in Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, a survey of 161 specialists regarding off-label use in Italy showed that 45% used SGLT2 inhibitors offlabel, but only some used International Consensus recommendations to reduce DKA risk, and two-thirds believed that ketosis required blood glucose levels .200 mg/dL (30).…”
Section: Barriers and Potential Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a survey of 161 specialists regarding off-label use in Italy showed that 45% used SGLT2 inhibitors offlabel, but only some used International Consensus recommendations to reduce DKA risk, and two-thirds believed that ketosis required blood glucose levels .200 mg/dL (30).…”
Section: Barriers and Potential Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The patterns and extent of off-label use of individual medicines and drug classes have been well documented in a range of settings and populations. 10,11 A variety of methodologies have been used including systematic reviews, online surveys and population-based prospective cohort studies. Patterns and predictors of off-label use of gabapentinoids have been examined using both prospective and retrospective, descriptive, cross-sectional study designs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patterns and extent of off‐label use of individual medicines and drug classes have been well documented in a range of settings and populations 10,11 . A variety of methodologies have been used including systematic reviews, online surveys and population‐based prospective cohort studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%