Current Opinion in Cardiology

2015

DOI: 10.1097/hco.0000000000000221

|View full text |Cite

|

Sign up to set email alerts

|

Off-pump coronary artery bypass

Harold L. Lazar¹

Abstract: OPCAB should only be performed by surgeons experienced in this technique in patients in whom a complete revascularization can be achieved; preferably with multiple arterial grafts.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Plos One1

Citation Types

Supporting

0

Mentioning

1

Contrasting

0

Year Published

2016

2016

2024

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article4

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent4

Authors

Journals

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 40 publications

Supporting

0

Mentioning

1

Contrasting

0

Order By: Relevance

“…experienced in OPCAB or performing OPCABs only, reported outcomes are equivalent to those of ONCAB procedures [32][33][34].…”

Section: Plos Onementioning

confidence: 95%

On-Pump vs Off-Pump coronary artery bypass surgery in atrial fibrillation. Analysis from the polish national registry of cardiac surgery procedures (KROK)

¹

,

²

,

³

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background No single randomized study has ever before addressed the safety of On-Pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs Off-Pump CABG in the setting of atrial fibrillation (AF) and data from small observational samples remain inconclusive. Methods and findings Procedural data from KROK (Polish National Registry of Cardiac Surgery Procedures) were retrospectively collected. Of initial 188,972 patients undergoing CABG, 7,913 presented with baseline AF (76.0% men, mean age 69.1±8.2) and underwent CABG without concomitant valve surgery between 2006-2019 in 37 reference centers across Poland. Mean followup was 4.7±3.5 years (median 4.3 IQR 1.7-7.4). Cox proportional hazards models were used for computations. Of included patients, 3,681 underwent On-Pump-(46.52%) as

“…experienced in OPCAB or performing OPCABs only, reported outcomes are equivalent to those of ONCAB procedures [32][33][34].…”

Section: Plos Onementioning

confidence: 95%

On-Pump vs Off-Pump coronary artery bypass surgery in atrial fibrillation. Analysis from the polish national registry of cardiac surgery procedures (KROK)

¹

,

²

,

³

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background No single randomized study has ever before addressed the safety of On-Pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs Off-Pump CABG in the setting of atrial fibrillation (AF) and data from small observational samples remain inconclusive. Methods and findings Procedural data from KROK (Polish National Registry of Cardiac Surgery Procedures) were retrospectively collected. Of initial 188,972 patients undergoing CABG, 7,913 presented with baseline AF (76.0% men, mean age 69.1±8.2) and underwent CABG without concomitant valve surgery between 2006-2019 in 37 reference centers across Poland. Mean followup was 4.7±3.5 years (median 4.3 IQR 1.7-7.4). Cox proportional hazards models were used for computations. Of included patients, 3,681 underwent On-Pump-(46.52%) as

On- vs. off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: A systematic review and meta-analysis

¹

,

²

,

³

2016

International Journal of Cardiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Off-pump CABG has some benefits over on-pump CABG, particularly in relation to post-operative atrial fibrillation.

Outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting with multiple arterial grafting by pump status in men and women

et al. 2024

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

No abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Product

Browser Extension Assistant by scite Citation Statement Search Reference Check Visualizations Dashboards Explore Journals Explore Organizations Explore Funders Embedding Badge Embedding Citation Search Pricing

Resources

Blog Help & FAQ Accessibility Statement API Terms For Universities & Governments For Researchers For Publishers For Corporate, Pharma & Enterprise Author Marketing Become an Affiliate Get an organization trial or quote scite Data & Services

About

News & Press Careers Read our Paper Coverage

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.