“…A possible solution is that clear agreements are set down concerning what information can be exchanged between the two partners when a minor is admitted to a mental health service, as has been mentioned in previous research (Darlington et al, 2005;Lane & Turner, 1999). Certain conditions are required to facilitate this information exchange: establishing clear written protocols (Darlington et al, 2005;Lane & Turner, 1999); organising joint case conferences (Darlington & Feeney, 2008); shared information systems (Chuang & Wells, 2010); and negotiated professional values (Williams, 2009). However, since the different actors saw youth psychiatrists as being in an advisory role to the juvenile judge, more is needed than simply agreements on information exchange.…”