Offline Digital Education for Medical Students: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration

Abstract

Background Medical schools in low- and middle-income countries are facing a shortage of staff, limited infrastructure, and restricted access to fast and reliable internet. Offline digital education may be an alternative solution for these issues, allowing medical students to learn at their own time and pace, without the need for a network connection. Objective The primary objective of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of offline digital education compared with traditional learning or a different form of offline digital education such as CD-ROM or PowerPoint presentations in improving knowledge, skills, attitudes, and satisfaction of medical students. The secondary objective was to assess the cost-effectiveness of offline digital education, changes in its accessibility or availability, and its unintended/adverse effects on students. Methods We carried out a systematic review of the literature by following the Cochrane methodology. We searched seven major electronic databases from January 1990 to August 2017 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cluster RCTs. Two authors independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. We assessed the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations criteria. Results We included 36 studies with 3325 medical students, of which 33 were RCTs and three were cluster RCTs. The interventions consisted of software programs, CD-ROMs, PowerPoint presentations, computer-based videos, and other computer-based interventions. The pooled estimate of 19 studies (1717 participants) showed no significant difference between offline digital education and traditional learning groups in terms of students’ postintervention knowledge scores (standardized mean difference=0.11, 95% CI –0.11 to 0.32; small effect size; low-quality evidence). Meta-analysis of four studies found that, compared with traditional learning, offline digital education improved medical students’ postintervention skills (standardized mean difference=1.05, 95% CI 0.15-1.95; large effect size; low-quality evidence). We are uncertain about the effects of offline digital education on students’ attitudes and satisfaction due to missing or incomplete outcome data. Only four studies estimated the costs of offline digital education, and none reported changes in accessibility or availability of such education or in the adverse effects. The risk of bias was predominantly high in more than half of the included studies. The overall quality of the evidence was low (for knowledge, skills, attitudes, and satisfaction) due to the study limitations and inconsistency across the studies. Conclusions Our findings suggest that offline digital education is as effective as traditional learning in terms of medical students’ knowledge and may be more effective than traditional learning in terms of medical students’ skills. H...

The 2019–2020 novel coronavirus (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) pandemic: A joint american college of academic international medicine-world academic council of emergency medicine multidisciplinary COVID-19 working group consensus paper

“…Medical institutions in LMICs may face a loss of staff, overburdened infrastructure, and limited ability to connect using high-speed, readily available, and reliable Internet. [ 636 ] This often precludes the use of the primary alternative to direct person-to-person contact – telemedicine and e-learning. [ 282 370 ] Consequently, despite significant technological progress in learning platforms, and increasing use of such platforms in HICs,[ 637 ] partners in LMICs may not be able to take full advantage of bidirectional information exchanges and various other virtual educational opportunities.…”

Digital Health Professions Education in the Field of Pediatrics: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration

“…For the purpose of this review, digital education can be defined as “an approach to teaching and learning, representing all or part of the educational model applied, that is based on the use of electronic media and devices as tools for improving access to training, communication and interaction, that facilitates the adaptation of new ways of understanding and developing learning” [33]. Digital education encompasses a variety of learning modalities including computer-based online/offline digital education (online/offline digital education), high-fidelity mannequins, virtual reality environments, virtual patient scenarios, serious gaming and gamification, and mobile learning, etc [15,20,27,34-36]. It is often combined with traditional nondigital learning, known as blended learning.…”

“…Unlike face-to-face lectures or tutorials, the number of learners who can participate in this type of education is far greater. Computer-based offline digital education provides increased access to learning materials with limited internet connectivity [14,15]. Mobile learning or mLearning supports learning in a similar way by enhancing the delivery of learning materials without time and place limitation through a handheld mobile device.…”

Digital Education of Health Professionals on the Management of Domestic Violence: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration

“…A more detailed description of the methodology is provided in the paper by Car et al [27]. This review is part of a global evidence-synthesis initiative for digital health professions’ education [28-39]. The search for the relevant trials was conducted across 7 databases: MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Elsevier), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Wiley), PsychINFO (Ovid), Educational Resource Information Centre (Ovid), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (EBSCO), and Web of Science Core Collection (Thomson Reuters).…”