2017 5th International Conference on Electrical Engineering - Boumerdes (ICEE-B) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icee-b.2017.8192092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Offline signature identification using the histogram of symbolic representation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the same setup, Djoudjai's et al . approach [5] achieved 98.63% accuracy where they used HOG features and histogram of symbolic representation (HSR) classifier for identification while we achieved 97.43% accuracy with our proposed approach on the same setup.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…With the same setup, Djoudjai's et al . approach [5] achieved 98.63% accuracy where they used HOG features and histogram of symbolic representation (HSR) classifier for identification while we achieved 97.43% accuracy with our proposed approach on the same setup.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Hadjadji et al [3] reported 92.05, 97.51, and 97.99% accuracy using Curvelet Transform with equi-spaced (ES), equi-mass (EM) and choquet fuzzy integral, respectively. With the same setup, Djoudjai's et al approach [5] achieved 98.63% accuracy where they used HOG features and histogram of symbolic representation (HSR) classifier for identification while we achieved 97.43% accuracy with our proposed approach on the same setup.…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Offline Signature identification is considered more difficult than online signature since offline signature does not have a dynamic feature that is present on online signature [1]. Offline signatures depend only on the capture signature shape available from the signature image, while online signatures can use various features such as pressure points and velocity of the drawn signature [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%