2009 10th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition 2009
DOI: 10.1109/icdar.2009.68
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Offline Signature Verification Based on Pseudo-Cepstral Coefficients

Abstract: Features representing information about pressure distribution from a static image of a handwritten signature are analyzed for an offline verification system. From gray-scale images, its histogram is calculated and used as "spectrum" for calculation of pseudo-cepstral coefficients. Finally, the unique minimum-phase sequence is estimated and used as feature vector for signature verification. The optimal number of pseudo-coefficients is estimated for best system performance. Experiments were carried out using a d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…User authentication based on signatures is a widely-studied field in biometrics since it is one of the most accepted verification techniques (Behera et al, 2017;Impedovo & Pirlo, 2008), mainly because of its usability. Signatures verification techniques are usually divided into online (Plamondon & Srihari, 2000) and offline (Vargas et al, 2009). Both approaches try to identify and characterize the features which define the signature of each user, trying to check if a signature is original or not, applying for these a wide spectrum of classifiers (Bibi et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…User authentication based on signatures is a widely-studied field in biometrics since it is one of the most accepted verification techniques (Behera et al, 2017;Impedovo & Pirlo, 2008), mainly because of its usability. Signatures verification techniques are usually divided into online (Plamondon & Srihari, 2000) and offline (Vargas et al, 2009). Both approaches try to identify and characterize the features which define the signature of each user, trying to check if a signature is original or not, applying for these a wide spectrum of classifiers (Bibi et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each signer, 12 genuine signatures are used for reference, whereas 12 genuine and 30 forgeries specimens are considered for testing. The system of Vargas et al [36] computes pseudo‐cepstral coefficients from the histogram of the grey‐scale signature image and uses least squares support vector machines for signature verification. In this case, 24 genuine and 24 forgeries from 100 individuals from the GPDS database are considered.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have focused on specific parts of signatures. For example, based on the characteristics that pixels of signature with high pressure appear as dark zones and therefore corresponds with gray levels conforming histogram, Vargas et al [54] computed pseudo-cepstral coefficients from the histogram of the static signature images as feature vectors for verification. Using signatures from 100 individuals, the author trained a Least Squares Support Vector Machines(LS-SVM) for classification and achieved 6.20% EER.…”
Section: A Offline Signature Authenticationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…forgeries [12]- [15]. From the aspect of data acquisition ways, signature authentication has been extended from the offline, in which signatures are mainly produced with the conventional pen and paper-based tools, to the online where signatures start to be acquired by electronic signature pads and pens.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%