1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf02998768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Offset parabolic reflector antennas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3] Usually, single-offest reflector and dual-offest reflector are used to design multibeam antenna for eliminating the effect of feed and secondary reflector. However, the asymmetry of reflector structure itself leads to the deterioration of cross-polarization (XP) and the value is generally about −25 dB, 4,5 which does not meet the high requirement in some special system. To improve the XP performance, the common scheme is (1) increasing the focal length to weaken the effect of the asymmetry on the XP performance 6,7 ; (2) reshaping the surface of the reflector to change the amplitude and phase distribution of surface field, then to improve the XP performance 8,9 ; (3) redesigning the feed to let it operate at the multimode state to improve the XP performance [10][11][12] ; (4) using dualreflector to suppress the XP performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Usually, single-offest reflector and dual-offest reflector are used to design multibeam antenna for eliminating the effect of feed and secondary reflector. However, the asymmetry of reflector structure itself leads to the deterioration of cross-polarization (XP) and the value is generally about −25 dB, 4,5 which does not meet the high requirement in some special system. To improve the XP performance, the common scheme is (1) increasing the focal length to weaken the effect of the asymmetry on the XP performance 6,7 ; (2) reshaping the surface of the reflector to change the amplitude and phase distribution of surface field, then to improve the XP performance 8,9 ; (3) redesigning the feed to let it operate at the multimode state to improve the XP performance [10][11][12] ; (4) using dualreflector to suppress the XP performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%