2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Offshore power generation with carbon capture and storage to decarbonise mainland electricity and offshore oil and gas installations: A techno-economic analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 40% drop by 2030 corresponds to an absolute reduction of 5.4 Mt of CO 2 equivalents compared with 2005. Feasible approaches include design optimization of the platform (Nguyen et al, 2019), energy efficiency measures (Nguyen et al, 2016), carbon capture and storage (Roussanaly et al, 2019) and electrification (Riboldi et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 40% drop by 2030 corresponds to an absolute reduction of 5.4 Mt of CO 2 equivalents compared with 2005. Feasible approaches include design optimization of the platform (Nguyen et al, 2019), energy efficiency measures (Nguyen et al, 2016), carbon capture and storage (Roussanaly et al, 2019) and electrification (Riboldi et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional processes such as carbon capture and storage (CCS) which captures CO 2 emissions by extraction and storing these emissions in a suitable geological formation for long-term isolation from the atmosphere will be required. 38,39,40 These technologies are required to reduce gas generation emissions. Decarbonisation of the energy grid in the future therefore requires technological development on two fronts, renewable-sourced energy storage and CCS.…”
Section: Uk's Electricity Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second capture chain, referred as chain B, investigates the cost reduction potential which would be achieved through an advanced amine. The amine is assumed to achieve a 20% reduction in steam consumption associated with CO 2 regeneration and an overall investment cost increase of 10% (Adams et al, 2017;Roussanaly et al, 2019). Larger uncertainties compared to the MEA solvent case are expected in the advanced amine case.…”
Section: Co 2 Capture and Ccs Chain Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%