Offshoring and the global distribution of work: Implications for task interdependence theory and practice

Abstract

A recent Offshoring Research Network (ORN) global survey of offshoring shows that since 2004 management concerns about operational issues on achieving the benefits of offshoring have increased significantly. In this paper we examine inter-task interdependence, a key operational determinant of inter-site interaction and communications in offshoring. We analyze existing theories of interdependence to examine the extent to which they provide guidance for understanding the interaction and communication requirements between work segments that are offshored and distributed across the globe. Using a series of mini-cases on globally distributed work (GDW), we show how the traditional typology of interdependence developed in the 1960s and 1970s is no longer adequate for understanding and managing task interdependencies in GDW. We propose three concepts to address this problem: integration interdependence, “hand-offs”, and information “stickiness”. We then show how our revised typology of interdependence enables a better understanding of the interactions and communication requirements between sites. Using this revised theory we propose guidelines for work design, and examine their implications for practical offshoring and work-distribution decisions. Implications for theory and practice for MNEs engaged in offshore relationships are discussed. Journal of International Business Studies (2009) 40, 642–667. doi:10.1057/jibs.2008.77

Managerial Coordination Challenges in the Alignment of Capabilities and New Subsidiary Charters in MNEs

“…This means that micro-political behavior is not targeted towards changing the charter (as suggested by prior research) but towards creating a mechanism of coordination which allows the avoidance accountability. Moreover, such maneuvers might be particularly prevalent in cases of co-specialization and high interdependence of subsidiaries (such as in cases of IT-Offshoring like GSS), where unilateral charter negotiations have severe consequences for the entire network of subsidiaries (Kumar et al, 2009;Rugman et al, 2011).…”

Offshoring of Services: A Review of the Literature and Organizing Framework

“…Kumar et al (2009) challenge the traditional typology of task interdependence and propose a revised version that takes into consideration the spatial disaggregation characterizing globally distributed work. They develop an extended typology of interdependence and highlight the notion of stickiness as a crucial aspect of individual task interdependencies in geographically dispersed work settings.…”

“…IB scholars have progressively investigated OS-related topics, widely reputed to be at the frontier of IB thinking (Doh et al 2009;Luo et al 2012;Manning et al 2008;Parkhe 2007). Published studies have highlighted that OS represents a new type of internationalization, which interests a variety of service activities (Javalgi et al 2009;Lewin et al 2009;Lewin and Peeters 2006;Nieto and Rodríguez 2011) and implies considerable repercussions at the individual, firm, and country levels (Bunyaratavej et al 2008;Contractor et al 2010;Kumar et al 2009;Liesch et al 2012;Manning et al 2010). Scholars have also suggested that OS generates important challenges to established IB theories, raising a host of stimulating questions and offering a fertile setting for research Doh 2005;Doh et al 2009;Kenney et al 2009).…”

Alliance strategy: context, process, and requirements

“…Relationship development evolves as a dynamic process. It also benefits from deliberate interventions such as group meetings, especially when individuals work at different sites (Kumar et al, 2009). Over time, individuals can develop a shared language, set of concepts, and style of communication.…”