Life history theory predicts a trade-off between offspring quality and quantity. Among large-bodied mammals, prolonged lactation and infant dependence suggest particularly strong potential for a qualityquantity trade-off to exist. Humans are one of the only such species to have been examined, providing mixed evidence under a peculiar set of circumstances, including extensive nutritional provisioning by nonmothers and extrasomatic wealth transmission. Here, we examine trade-offs between reproductive rate and one aspect of offspring quality (body size) in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii), a species with long periods of infant dependence and little direct provisioning. Juvenile lean body mass, estimated using urinary creatinine excretion, was positively associated with the interval to the next sibling's birth. These effects persisted into adolescence and were not moderated by maternal identity. Maternal depletion could not explain poor offspring growth, as older mothers had larger offspring, and low maternal energy balance during lactation predicted larger, not smaller, juvenile size. Instead, our data suggest that offspring growth suffers when mothers wean early to invest in new reproductive efforts. These findings indicate that chimpanzee mothers with the resources to do so prioritize production of new offspring over prolonged investment in current offspring.life history | growth | reproduction | primates | weaning P arents face a fundamental life-history trade-off between producing more offspring and investing in the quality of each progeny (1-4). This offspring quality-quantity trade-off, along with a trade-off between reproductive investment and parental survival, means that maximizing reproductive rates is often not the strategy that maximizes fitness (5-7). The quality-quantity trade-off has been empirically demonstrated in species that produce litters or clutches, where large litter size often leads to small offspring size, slow growth rates, and reduced survival, particularly under conditions of ecological stress (8-11). Comparative analyses also support a negative interspecific relationship between reproductive rate and offspring size (12, 13). The quality-quantity trade-off has rarely been examined in species for which single births are the norm, and for which reproductive rate is determined by the interval between successive births. Such species are important tests of the model, as a slow breeding strategy suggests a particularly potent trade-off between offspring investment and reproductive rate. Understanding how individuals negotiate this trade-off can provide important insights into the evolution of reproductive biology and behavior.Data on humans are valuable because humans invest intensively in offspring, yet have highly variable reproductive rates. Many studies find the predicted negative relationship between reproductive rates and offspring growth or health (14-18) or demonstrate fitness maximization at intermediate levels of fertility (19-21). For example, when a water tap was ...