2017
DOI: 10.29299/kefad.2017.18.3.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilgi Okuryazarlık Düzeyleri ile Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojilerine Yönelik Tutumları

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…When the studies in the national literature are examined, it can be said that teachers' use of technology in education is an important subject of research. In the studies, it is seen that teachers' use of technology in education (Avcu & Gökdaş, 2012;Bayraktar, 2015;Çakır & Oktay, 2013;Öçal & Şimşek, 2017;Tanık-Önal, 2017;Yılmaz, Üredi & Akbaşlı, 2015), their competency of technology use in education (Bakırcı & Günbatar, 2017;Çetin, Çalışkan & Menzi, 2012;Durak & Seferoğlu, 2017;Kuşkaya-Mumcu, 2017;Ozan & Taşgın, 2017;Tatlı & Akbulut, 2017;Yılmaz et al, 2015), their attitudes towards using technology in education (Bakırcı & Günbatar, 2017;Çetin et al, 2012;Kaya, 2017;Şimşek, 2015)and their anxiety in using technology in education are examined (Cabı & Ergün, 2016;Yalçınalp & Cabı, 2015).…”
Section: Extended Abstract Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the studies in the national literature are examined, it can be said that teachers' use of technology in education is an important subject of research. In the studies, it is seen that teachers' use of technology in education (Avcu & Gökdaş, 2012;Bayraktar, 2015;Çakır & Oktay, 2013;Öçal & Şimşek, 2017;Tanık-Önal, 2017;Yılmaz, Üredi & Akbaşlı, 2015), their competency of technology use in education (Bakırcı & Günbatar, 2017;Çetin, Çalışkan & Menzi, 2012;Durak & Seferoğlu, 2017;Kuşkaya-Mumcu, 2017;Ozan & Taşgın, 2017;Tatlı & Akbulut, 2017;Yılmaz et al, 2015), their attitudes towards using technology in education (Bakırcı & Günbatar, 2017;Çetin et al, 2012;Kaya, 2017;Şimşek, 2015)and their anxiety in using technology in education are examined (Cabı & Ergün, 2016;Yalçınalp & Cabı, 2015).…”
Section: Extended Abstract Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teknoloji kabul modeliUlusal literatürde yapılan çalışmalar incelendiğinde öğretmenlerin eğitimde teknoloji kullanımının üzerinde önemle durulan bir araştırma konusu olduğu söylenebilir. Yapılan çalışmalarda öğretmenlerin eğitimde teknoloji kullanım durumlarının(Avcu ve Gökdaş, 2012;Bayraktar, 2015;Çakır ve Oktay, 2013;Öçal ve Şimşek, 2017;Tanık-Önal, 2017;Yılmaz, Üredi ve Akbaşlı, 2015), eğitimde teknoloji kullanımı yeterliliklerinin(Bakırcı ve Günbatar, 2017;Çetin, Çalışkan ve Menzi, 2012;Durak ve Seferoğlu, 2017;Kuşkaya-Mumcu, 2017;Ozan ve Taşgın, 2017;Tatlı ve Akbulut, 2017; Yılmaz ve diğerleri, 2015) eğitimde teknoloji kullanımına yönelik tutumlarının(Bakırcı ve Günbatar, 2017; Çetin ve diğerleri, 2012;Kaya, 2017;Şimşek, 2015) ve eğitimde teknoloji kullanımına yönelik kaygılarının(Cabı ve Ergün, 2016;Yalçınalp ve Cabı, 2015) incelendiği görülmektedir. Ancak öğretmenlerin teknoloji kabullerini belirlemeye yönelik yeterli çalışma yapılmamıştır.…”
unclassified
“…Male prospective teachers are more confident in using ICT than female prospective teachers. In similar studies, significant differences in favour of male prospective teachers have been found in the ICT attitudes, virtual communication, computer hardware and software usage sub-dimensions (Bakırcı and Günbatar, 2017), technology integration selfefficacy, technology knowledge dimension (Şimşek and Yazar, 2018), attitudes towards technology (Şen and Timur, 2018), information security knowledge levels (Gökmen and Akgün, 2014) views on information technology teacher competencies as well as technological practices and support competencies (Dursun and Saracaloğlu, 2017) of the prospective teachers. Similarly, it has been concluded in the studies conducted with teachers that there was a significant difference in teachers' self-efficacy perceptions of technology (Kartal, Temelli and Şahin, 2018), their technology acceptance levels (Sırakaya, 2019) and their educational technologies usage levels (Çelik and Demirtaş, 2019) in favour of male teachers.…”
Section: Discussion Conclusion and Suggestionsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In studies on ICT and education technologies conducted with prospective teachers and teachers, it has been seen that similar results to this study were obtained. It has been determined in the studies carried out that, prospective teachers' attitudes towards ICT were moderate (Bakırcı and Günbatar, 2017), they had positive attitudes (Bakırcı, Cancan and Uzunyol, 2017), and they generally had positive opinions about mobile communication technologies (Pan and Akay, 2016 ), they had a positive technology attitude level (Örün, Orhan, Dönmez & Kurt, 2015), they had the skills of using ICT (Maryuningsih, Hidayat, Riandi & Rustaman, 2020) they felt average in using ICT (Fokides and Kostas, 2020;Murat and Erten, 2018). In addition, it has been determined that the attitudes of the prospective teachers towards instructional technologies were at a good level (Akgün, 2020), prospective science teachers had positive opinions about ICT use (Tanık Önal, 2017) and prospective Physics, Chemistry and Biology teachers had positive opinions about ICT use as well, however; half of the prospective teachers stated that they felt competent in the use of ICT and the other half stated that they did not feel competent enough (Saraç and Özarslan, 2017).…”
Section: Discussion Conclusion and Suggestionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dolaysıyla her iki grupta yer alan öğrencilerin benzer öğrenme ortamında yer almaları, aynı öğretmenlerden ders almaları ve benzer sosyoekonomik düzeyde olmalar ile açıklanabilir. Alanyazında cinsiyet üzerinde farklı konularda yapılan çalışmalarda değişik sonuçlara ulaşılmasına rağmen, çalışmaların büyük çoğunluğunda cinsiyet değişkeni üzerinde bağımsız değişkenlerin etkisinin olmadığı tespit edilmiştir (Bakırcı ve Günbatar, 2017). Örneğin Aydın ve diğ., (2017), 4.-8. sınıflarda öğrenim gören öğrencilerin FeTeMM tutumları bazı değişkenler açısından inceledikleri çalışmada, FeTeMM tutumlarında cinsiyet değişkenin etkili olmadığını saptamışlardır.…”
Section: Tartışma Sonuç Ve öNerilerunclassified