2018
DOI: 10.17679/inuefd.288198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Öğretmen Adaylarının Elektronik Portfolyoya Yönelik Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi: Weebly Örneği

Abstract: The study aimed at reviewing opinions of preservice teachers on electronic portfolio and Weebly. In line with the purpose of the study, answers were sought for the questions "how did preservice teachers define electronic portfolio?", "what are the opinions of preservice teachers on the electronic portfolio activity performed?" and "what are the opinions of preservice teachers on Weebly which is used as an electronic portfolio system?". Case study was employed as a qualitative research method under the study. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are also studies in the literature in which the opinions of prospective teachers about e-portfolio are taken. For example, in the study conducted by Çukurbaşı and Kıyıcı (2018), the opinions of prospective teacher regarding e-portfolio were taken. As a result of the study, it was seen that the prospective teachers expressed a positive opinion that eportfolio is a functional tool.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also studies in the literature in which the opinions of prospective teachers about e-portfolio are taken. For example, in the study conducted by Çukurbaşı and Kıyıcı (2018), the opinions of prospective teacher regarding e-portfolio were taken. As a result of the study, it was seen that the prospective teachers expressed a positive opinion that eportfolio is a functional tool.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When literature is examined, it is seen that there are studies which are aimed at determining digital literacy, digital competence and digital profiles of teachers and teacher candidates (Aksakal et al, 2021;Aksoy et al, 2021;Alarcón et al, 2020;Çukurbaşı & Kıyıcı, 2018;Esteve-Mon et al, 2020;Geçgel et al, 2020;Göksu & Koçak, 2020;Gündüz, 2021;Händel et al, 2020;Karaoğlan Yılmaz & Binay Eyuboğlu, 2018;Kormos, 2018;Kurniawati et al, 2018;Kuru, 2019;Li et al, 2019;Pischetola, 2020;Quaicoe & Pata, 2018;Singh, 2021;Yalçın, 2017;Wilson et al, 2020;Yazıcıoğlu et al, 2020). The results of some of the researches that served as a source for the research were analysed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%