2020
DOI: 10.16949/turkbilmat.736600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Öğretmen Adaylarının Web 2.0 Araçlarını Uygulama Süreci ve Öğretim Ortamlarında Kullanımına Yönelik Görüşleri

Abstract: New understandings and methods have proliferated as technology continues to root itself more deeply in an increasing number of areas within the field of education, causing, naturally, the technology-based tools to find a wider application in assessing students' knowledge and progress. With the resulting rapid development of Web applications, Web 2.0 tools have found a niche in a great many steps of the instruction process and have emerged as an integral part of educational technology. Indeed, those studying to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other emphasized limitations included problem with class management in crowded classrooms and student focus on software. This result is in parallel with the results of other studies in the literature (Çankaya, Durak & Yünkül, 2013;Demirkan, Gürışık & Akın, 2017;Ekici, 2017;Gürışık, 2018;Gürleroğlu, 2019;Kantar, 2022;Ningsih & Mulyano, 2019;Özpınar, 2020;Saleem, 2011).…”
Section: Conclusion Discussion and Recommendationssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other emphasized limitations included problem with class management in crowded classrooms and student focus on software. This result is in parallel with the results of other studies in the literature (Çankaya, Durak & Yünkül, 2013;Demirkan, Gürışık & Akın, 2017;Ekici, 2017;Gürışık, 2018;Gürleroğlu, 2019;Kantar, 2022;Ningsih & Mulyano, 2019;Özpınar, 2020;Saleem, 2011).…”
Section: Conclusion Discussion and Recommendationssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The points emphasized in regard to the advantages coincide with the evaluations made by teacher on applications which he performed in different levels and various courses with Web 2.0 tools. Both in this study and in the literature, the teacher emphasized that software have the ability to provide instant feedback, give the chance to see and correct mistakes thanks to individual feedbacks, and support the learning (Demirkan, Gürışık & Akın, 2017;Elmahdi, Al-Hattami & Fawzi, 2018;Freeman & Tashner, 2015;Gürışık, 2018;Zengin, Bars & Şimşek, 2017), have the ability to archive questions and results (Elmahdi, Al-Hattami & Fawzi, 2018;Gürışık, 2018;Özpınar, 2020), make the courses fun (Özpınar, 2020;Zengin, Bars & Şimşek, 2017), and effective instruction (Demirkan, Gürışık & Akın, 2017;Elmahdi, Al-Hattami & Fawzi, 2018;Gürışık, 2018;McCabe, 2006;VandeWalle, 2016).…”
Section: Conclusion Discussion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, it is important in terms of language teaching to provide environments where learners can gain reading, writing, listening, and speaking skills. With the interaction provided by web tools (Kaynar, 2019;Özpınar, 2020), it is possible to expose the learner to the language and use it as a communication tool (Balbay, 2018). It also supports the l earner-centered teaching process by enabling learners to communicate with each other, allowing for pair and group work, and collaborative work in terms of learner interaction (Kaynar, 2019).…”
Section: Web Tools In Language Teachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bu amaç doğrulusunda aşağıdaki sorulara yanıt aranmaktadır. (Becker, 2012;Özpınar, 2020). Bu bağlamda fen bilimleri öğretmenlerinin uygun ortamlar oluşturulduğunda teknoloji yetkinliklerinin arttığı söylenebilir.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified