“Oh no, they caught it!”: Vicarious experience of COVID-19, protection motivation and protective behaviors

Abstract

Utilizing the components of the protection motivation theory, this study investigated the role of close others’ diagnosis of COVID-19 (as a vicarious experience) in individuals’ adherence to protective behavior against COVID-19. Path analysis of online survey data from 3695 participants showed that the presence of a diagnosed close other was positively related to perceived vulnerability, while being negatively related to perceived response efficacy and self-efficacy. In addition, perceived severity and efficacy appraisals were positively associated with protective behavioral tendencies. Although efficacy appraisal mediated the relationship between vicarious experience and protective behavior, threat appraisal did not mediate this relationship. In sum, the results suggest that efficacy appraisal derived from vicarious experiences can be more consequential for protective behaviors than threat appraisal. Implications of these results on future large-scale health crises are discussed along with limitations and future directions.

Psychosocial determinants of handwashing and physical distancing behaviour during the Covid-19 pandemic in the Netherlands: a longitudinal analysis

“…In a similar vein, cues to action also had a substantial impact on behaviour: when having symptoms or immediately after a positive test, people washed their hands more often, but on the longer term both positive tests and vaccination reduced people's adherence to behavioural guidelines. This indicates people acted quite rationally and altruistically: more careful on the short term due to increased chances to infect others (Elazab, Ozden, Baruh, & Cemalcilar, 2023), and less on the longer term because previous infections or vaccinations reduced covid-risks.…”