2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.06.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oil and gas platforms with steam bottoming cycles: System integration and thermoenvironomic evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Minimum individual temperature differences (∆T min /2) of 2, 4 and 8 K [Nguyen et al,2014c] are assumed for phase-changing, liquid and gaseous streams. The potential for internal heat recovery can be investigated, and minimizing the external cooling and heating demands results in smaller fuel demand and greater gas production.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minimum individual temperature differences (∆T min /2) of 2, 4 and 8 K [Nguyen et al,2014c] are assumed for phase-changing, liquid and gaseous streams. The potential for internal heat recovery can be investigated, and minimizing the external cooling and heating demands results in smaller fuel demand and greater gas production.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most obvious countermeasure is to exploit the waste heat available through some waste heat-to-power configurations. There is a comprehensive literature on the topic, including an analysis of the challenges and limitations of offshore bottoming cycles [6], analyses on the best working fluid [7], optimal design of combined cycles (an organic Rankine cycle for power generation in [8] and for combined heat and power in [9], a steam Rankine cycle for power generation in [10] and for combined heat and power in [11]) also considering off-design operating conditions [12], site-scale integration considerations [13], and evaluation of dynamic operation and of control strategies for fast load change [14]. Even though offshore combined cycles are proved to be effective for achieving CO 2 emissions reductions, their utilization has been very limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the scientific literature, there exist several possibilities for improving the energy efficiency of offshore platforms [5]. For instance, energy integration is minimal, with possibly a couple of internal oil/oil or oil/water heat exchangers [6]. The use of waste heat from the gas turbine exhausts to generate additional power through Rankine cycles is not common, because of weight and space issues on offshore facilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%