2017
DOI: 10.1111/bph.13799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Olcegepant blocks neurogenic and non‐neurogenic CGRPergic vasodepressor responses and facilitates noradrenergic vasopressor responses in pithed rats

Abstract: Olcegepant (i.v.) selectively blocked the neurogenic and non-neurogenic CGRPergic vasodepressor responses. This blockade by olcegepant potentiated the neurogenic and non-neurogenic noradrenergic vasopressor responses in pithed rats, an effect that might result in an increased vascular resistance and, consequently, in a prohypertensive action.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(95 reference statements)
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Control groups received the same volume of identical vehicle via the same route. The selected olcegepant doses were within the previously reported dose range (1μg/kg–30mg/kg) in experimental models in rodents 29,30,32–37 . In rats, 1mg/kg olcegepant, which we used herein, has yielded a peak plasma concentration of 0.8μM compared with peak plasma concentrations of approximately 0.15μM after a 10mg dose in clinical studies 34,38–41 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Control groups received the same volume of identical vehicle via the same route. The selected olcegepant doses were within the previously reported dose range (1μg/kg–30mg/kg) in experimental models in rodents 29,30,32–37 . In rats, 1mg/kg olcegepant, which we used herein, has yielded a peak plasma concentration of 0.8μM compared with peak plasma concentrations of approximately 0.15μM after a 10mg dose in clinical studies 34,38–41 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Finally, we sought to examine the relative potencies of olcegepant and rimegepant in isolated mouse and human blood vessels to confirm the dose ranges we selected based on previous work (Fig 8). 32–37,42,43 To this end, we tested these drugs. In mouse aorta, the 1μM, 3μM, and 10μM concentrations of olcegepant all significantly shifted the concentration–response curve to rat α‐CGRP (control pEC 50 = 8.02 ± 0.08, 1μM pEC 50 = 6.55 ± 0.16, 3μM pEC 50 = 6.35 ± 0.11, 10μM pEC 50 = 5.41 ± 0.18, p < 0.001, mean ± SEM, 1‐way ANOVA for repeated measures).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, it is important to note that we did not measure sensory nerve activity directly, but the electrically-induced CGRP release in the systemic vasculature could be estimated indirectly by measurement of the evoked vasodepressor response, as previously established using the CGRP receptor antagonists CGRP 8–37 [ 12 ] and olcegepant [ 24 ]. Hence, the inhibition by DHE was considered sensory-inhibitory since this ergot inhibited the vasodepressor responses induced by spinal (T 9 -T 12 ) stimulation of the vasodepressor sensory CGRPergic outflow (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, this was known as the nonadrenergic-noncholinergic (NANC) component of the vasodepressor sensory outflow [ 33 ]. To sum up, the pithed rat model is a powerful tool to investigate the role of several monoaminergic receptors in the inhibition of the perivascular sympathetic and sensory CGRPergic outflows [ 10 , 34 , 35 ]. The major advantages of the pithed rat model over other experimental approaches include, among others: (i) the exclusion of neural reflexes integrated in the CNS that allow us to study local and systemic perivascular modulation; (ii) the reproducibility of vascular responses induced pharmacologically and/or electrically (as the preparation lasts several hours); (iii) this reproducibility and long-lasting experimental protocols allow the rats to be their own controls (particularly for the sympathetic outflow) by comparing the effect of drugs before and after treatments; (iv) the relatively low cost of the model; and (v) the possibility of stimulating the autonomic (sympathetic) or sensory perivascular outflows involved in cardiovascular responses in a selective manner.…”
Section: The Rat Vasculature As a Preclinical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%