2022
DOI: 10.3390/jrfm15120584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Old but Resilient Story: Impact of Decentralization on Social Welfare

Abstract: This paper analyzes the fiscal performance of Turkey and Argentina during the period 2000–2021, when both countries faced rapid economic growth with the consequent impact on social welfare. This work explored two different systems: Centralization in Turkey and Federalism in Argentina and, in general, studied the decentralization impact of both the systems on social welfare. This study intended to create new social welfare indexes in other regions to analyze the resource allocation in different regions of these… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During COVID-19, they gained new export opportunities, especially to Europe and the US, because of the supply disruptions and logistics cost increases, especially in East Asia. Medium-size firms might have applied for and accessed more credit to finance their new investment, as they increased their ability to satisfy the increasing export orders and the need for more domestic products in the domestic market (Delgado et al, 2022). Our empirical results confirm this potential explanation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…During COVID-19, they gained new export opportunities, especially to Europe and the US, because of the supply disruptions and logistics cost increases, especially in East Asia. Medium-size firms might have applied for and accessed more credit to finance their new investment, as they increased their ability to satisfy the increasing export orders and the need for more domestic products in the domestic market (Delgado et al, 2022). Our empirical results confirm this potential explanation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%