2020
DOI: 10.1515/bz-2020-0035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Old statues, new meanings. Literary, epigraphic and archaeological evidence for Christian reidentification of statuary

Abstract: This article examines literary, epigraphic and archaeological evidence for the Christian reidentification of statuary and reliefs as biblical scenes and protagonists, saints and angels. It argues that Christian identifications were promulgated, amongst others by local bishops, to make sense of imagery of which the original identity had been lost and/or was no longer meaningful. Three conditions for a new identification are discussed: the absence of an epigraphic label, geographical and/or chronological distanc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is obvious that traditional Greek and Roman religion still had a long life ahead of it after Constantine's victory at the Milvian Bridge (Kaegi 1966;Trombley 1985;Harl 1990; many studies in Ameling 2017). As Hartmut Leppin (2012) has persuasively argued, we should not see Christianization as a teleological, unidirectional process, but as a complex of developments, which took place in different rhythms in different places, with some areas embracing Christianity fairly late, such as the western Balkan (Bratož 1996), whereas in other areas that had been converted very early, such as Asia Minor, pagan statuary survived in fully Christianized cities well into the 6th century (Jacobs 2010(Jacobs , 2018(Jacobs , 2020in general, Smith and Ward-Perkins 2016). In the end, though, as per Leppin, this process gradually led to the hegemony of Christian discourses and practices instead of via a quick, violent transition.…”
Section: Conclusion and Final Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is obvious that traditional Greek and Roman religion still had a long life ahead of it after Constantine's victory at the Milvian Bridge (Kaegi 1966;Trombley 1985;Harl 1990; many studies in Ameling 2017). As Hartmut Leppin (2012) has persuasively argued, we should not see Christianization as a teleological, unidirectional process, but as a complex of developments, which took place in different rhythms in different places, with some areas embracing Christianity fairly late, such as the western Balkan (Bratož 1996), whereas in other areas that had been converted very early, such as Asia Minor, pagan statuary survived in fully Christianized cities well into the 6th century (Jacobs 2010(Jacobs , 2018(Jacobs , 2020in general, Smith and Ward-Perkins 2016). In the end, though, as per Leppin, this process gradually led to the hegemony of Christian discourses and practices instead of via a quick, violent transition.…”
Section: Conclusion and Final Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Casos similares de reutilización, reubicación y resignificación de estatuas paganas en un contexto cristiano tardo antiguo sugieren que las piezas figuradas tuvieron también un valor discursivo (Kristensen, 2013, pp. 232-248;Jacobs, 2020). Partiendo pues desde este punto de vista, los sarcófagos y estatuas reutilizados en Madīnat al-Zahrā' fueron sin duda un recurso material y decorativo, pero muy probablemente fueron también piezas con un valor discursivo y un significado propio, es decir, eran el centro de relatos que aunaban diferentes tradiciones y memorias propias del mundo islámico y eran capaces de evocar una reflexión acerca del paso del tiempo, la sabiduría de los antiguos, la banalidad de las cosas temporales, lo eterno y lo perecedero, lo virtuoso o lo criticable, y las advertencias del pasado de cara al presente y al futuro.…”
Section: La Colección De Antigüedades De Madīnat Al-zahrā'unclassified