2016
DOI: 10.1108/mhrj-09-2014-0033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Older adult recovery: “What are we working towards?”

Abstract: Purpose – The perspectives of frontline clinical staff working with individuals in later life within an inpatient mental health setting, of their role in recovery, have not yet been explored. The purpose of this paper is to understand what recovery means within an inpatient mental health setting for older adults. The authors address clear implications for clinical practice. Design/methodology/approach – Semi-structured interviews were co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This broad-stroke approach to research and service delivery promotes a single and homogenous model of recovery, which may ignore the idiosyncratic needs and narratives of subgroups such as children, young people and older adult populations (Barnett & Lapsley, 2006;Lal, 2010;Rankin & Petty, 2016). In relation to young people, the use of adult driven recovery models may be ignoring the typical cognitive, behavioural, environmental and social developmental factors that are unique to this stage of development (Simonds, Pons, Stone, Warren, & John, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This broad-stroke approach to research and service delivery promotes a single and homogenous model of recovery, which may ignore the idiosyncratic needs and narratives of subgroups such as children, young people and older adult populations (Barnett & Lapsley, 2006;Lal, 2010;Rankin & Petty, 2016). In relation to young people, the use of adult driven recovery models may be ignoring the typical cognitive, behavioural, environmental and social developmental factors that are unique to this stage of development (Simonds, Pons, Stone, Warren, & John, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%