2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Older adults’ acceptance of fully automated vehicles: Effects of exposure, driving style, age, and driving conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Across the four different test rides, passengers mentioned the driving style of the shuttle less frequently, as they gained experiences with it. Previous research shows that driving style has been also shown to be an important factor for acceptance of AVs in the older population [56]. Regarding factors that would increase their perceived safety, the option to contact someone in a control room was mentioned most often.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Across the four different test rides, passengers mentioned the driving style of the shuttle less frequently, as they gained experiences with it. Previous research shows that driving style has been also shown to be an important factor for acceptance of AVs in the older population [56]. Regarding factors that would increase their perceived safety, the option to contact someone in a control room was mentioned most often.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A widely lauded benefit of smart technologies amongst our participants was the use of AVs to support independence and mobility, should they lose their driver's license. This benefit is little reported in literature reviews of community views on smart aging [27,29,35,36,41], as these primarily focus on smart homes and wearables, but it is noted in papers focusing only on AVs [42,43]. Hagzare et al (p. 2) [43] suggest that acceptance by older people relates to the balance between "the perceived reliability of the system and the perceived benefits of the technology" and that, in participants with exposure to AVs, coherence between their driving style and the driving style of the AV (e.g., aggressive or cautious) may impact on their acceptance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This benefit is little reported in literature reviews of community views on smart aging [27,29,35,36,41], as these primarily focus on smart homes and wearables, but it is noted in papers focusing only on AVs [42,43]. Hagzare et al (p. 2) [43] suggest that acceptance by older people relates to the balance between "the perceived reliability of the system and the perceived benefits of the technology" and that, in participants with exposure to AVs, coherence between their driving style and the driving style of the AV (e.g., aggressive or cautious) may impact on their acceptance. This is in line with our findings that technologies should be individually tailored, rather than 'one size fits all'.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies often show a tendency that older people have a lower acceptance towards current technologies. This may be because their cognitive abilities have decreased, and the difficulty of using modern technological devices has increased [73,74]. Becic et al [75] concluded that they still act conservatively and avoid the potentially harmful consequences of new technologies.…”
Section: Word-of-mouth or Digital Media In Agricultural Smesmentioning
confidence: 99%