Older care-home residents as collaborators or advisors in research: a systematic review

Abstract

Background: patient and public involvement (PPI) in research can enhance its relevance. Older care-home residents are often not involved in research processes even when studies are care-home focused.Objective: to conduct a systematic review to find out to what extent and how older care-home residents have been involved in research as collaborators or advisors.Methods: a systematic literature search of 12 databases, covering the period from 1990 to September 2014 was conducted. A lateral search was also carried out. Standardised inclusion criteria were used and checked independently by two researchers.Results: nineteen reports and papers were identified relating to 11 different studies. Care-home residents had been involved in the research process in multiple ways. Two key themes were identified: (i) the differences in residents' involvement in small-scale and large-scale studies and (ii) the barriers to and facilitators of involvement.Conclusions: small-scale studies involved residents as collaborators in participatory action research, whereas larger studies involved residents as consultants in advisory roles. There are multiple facilitators of and barriers to involving residents as PPI members. The reporting of PPI varies. While it is difficult to evaluate the impact of involving care-home residents on the research outcomes, impact has been demonstrated from more inclusive research processes with care-home residents. The review shows that older care-home residents can be successfully involved in the research process.

End‐of‐life priorities of older adults with terminal illness and caregivers: A qualitative consultation

“…Our findings reinforce the call for patient‐centred care, that is, health care that is responsive to the preferences, needs and values of each patient regardless of whether the goals of care are curative and interventional or focused on a palliative approach. Our findings also support the need to include consumer voices in facilitating health service improvement …”

“…This qualitative study involved public consultation and representation of views including those of different ages, ethnicity and experience of health care. Involving older people as advisors has shown to enhance the relevance of health services research . The information collected in our consultation covered recent experiences in the health system and home settings and is of relevance for clinicians and health service planners.…”

“You're at their mercy”: Older peoples' experiences of moving from home to a care home: A grounded theory study

“…Older people are often not involved in research processes even when studies are care‐home‐focused (Backhouse et al, ). Some studies that have focused on the decision‐making processes surrounding the move have highlighted that older adults rarely initiate relocation decisions relying instead on family, professionals or both to determine when relocation is called for (Fraher & Coffey, ; Keister, ; Reed, Cook, Sullivan, & Burridge, ).…”

Engaging older patients with cancer and their caregivers as partners in cancer research

“…Engaging patient partners in clinical research has been shown to be feasible and to have a variety of positive outcomes . However, in geriatric oncology research, specific mechanisms and the logistics of assembling a patient and caregiver partner stakeholder group that is mutually beneficial to both the research team and the stakeholder group to the best of our knowledge has not yet been thoroughly explored.…”

“…Engaging patient partners in clinical research has been shown to be feasible and to have a variety of positive outcomes. 10 However, in geriatric oncology research, specific mechanisms and the logistics of assembling a patient and caregiver partner stakeholder group that is mutually beneficial to both the research team and the stakeholder group to the best of our knowledge has not yet been thoroughly explored. Herein, we described our patient partner engagement in study optimization, shape, conduct, and the dissemination of research findings using PCORI's 6 principles as a guide: 1) reciprocal relationships; 2) co-learning; 3) partnerships; 4) transparency; 5) honesty; and 6) trust.…”