1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4522(97)00520-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Olfaction in rats with extensive lesions of the olfactory bulbs: implications for odor coding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

14
61
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
14
61
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the implanted cannulae, puncture of the main olfactory bulbs by the injection needle, and the bilateral 2-µL saline injection had no detectable impact on the behavior. This was consistent with the studies of Slotnick and coworkers showing that only major lesions encompassing Ն80% of the MOB led to deficits in odor discrimination (Lu and Slotnick 1998).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Therefore, the implanted cannulae, puncture of the main olfactory bulbs by the injection needle, and the bilateral 2-µL saline injection had no detectable impact on the behavior. This was consistent with the studies of Slotnick and coworkers showing that only major lesions encompassing Ն80% of the MOB led to deficits in odor discrimination (Lu and Slotnick 1998).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In general, the present results are in agreement with our previous studies showing that surgical disruption of identified patterns of bulbar inputs are primarily without effect in a variety of behavior tests, including those for odor quality (Lu and Slotnick, 1994;Slotnick and Bodyak, 2002;Bisulco and Slotnick, 2003), sensitivity (Slotnick et al, 1997), and two-odor and odor mixture discrimination tasks (Slotnick et al, 1989;Lu and Slotnick, 1998;Bisulco and Slotnick, 2003). One explanation for these outcomes is that extensive training may have altered patterns of bulbar activation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…It should be further recognized that most of the animals in these studies were given smaller lesions (Lu and Slotnick, 1994;Slotnick et al, 1997), which would be predicted to spare more function. In addition, the animals were typically tested with many odorants (Lu and Slotnick, 1998), and any subsequent statistical analysis then collapsed responses across different odorants, or involved so many randomly selected odorants that the specific deficits that should have been predicted from the patterns of 2DG uptake could easily have been obscured. Analyses also were often collapsed across animals that had received lesions of various sizes and locations, potentially obscuring additional specific deficits.…”
Section: Bulbar Ablation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%