2021
DOI: 10.1002/fsh.10646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Olfactory Activation: Imprinting as an Emerging Frontier in the Conservation of Non‐Salmonid Migratory Fishes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, many salmonids rely on olfactory cues to return to natal streams (Bett et al 2018), whereas hydrologic and morphologic factors predict spawning site selection (Benjankar et al 2016). Continued research is needed to assess the homing behaviors of catostomids and other nonsalmonid fishes (Cooke et al 2005;Cathcart 2021). The presence of conspecifics may attract individuals to an aggregation (Anteneh et al 2012) or, alternatively, may increase competitive exclusion, whereby some individuals drive others away from the spawning sites (Grabowski and Isely 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, many salmonids rely on olfactory cues to return to natal streams (Bett et al 2018), whereas hydrologic and morphologic factors predict spawning site selection (Benjankar et al 2016). Continued research is needed to assess the homing behaviors of catostomids and other nonsalmonid fishes (Cooke et al 2005;Cathcart 2021). The presence of conspecifics may attract individuals to an aggregation (Anteneh et al 2012) or, alternatively, may increase competitive exclusion, whereby some individuals drive others away from the spawning sites (Grabowski and Isely 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continued research is needed to assess the homing behaviors of catostomids and other nonsalmonid fishes (Cooke et al. 2005; Cathcart 2021). The presence of conspecifics may attract individuals to an aggregation (Anteneh et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our data support the use of the blue sucker as a flow‐sensitive species that can be used to guide environmental flow decisions (Freeman et al, 2022), particularly in states such as Texas where ecological validation of flow regime standards is needed (Perkin et al, 2023). Specifically, our work informs management decisions by (1) reinforcing the need to protect riffle mesohabitats that are subject to the effects of flow alteration (Acre et al, 2021), (2) informing ecologically relevant values of habitat fragmentation and flow alteration that should be preserved or perhaps restored in regulated rivers (Wohl, 2017), and (3) providing quantitative descriptions for physical characteristic of rivers where repatriation efforts might be attempted in the future to reverse the pattern of decline for species such as blue sucker (Cathcart, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In salmon and other species, research on olfactory imprinting informs conservation efforts because, for example, the findings support development of artificial propagation programs that encourage homing to targeted locations ( Dittman et al, 2015 ). Despite extensive research on olfactory imprinting in Pacific salmon and relevance of olfactory imprinting to management of various species, evidence for olfactory imprinting by non-salmonid species is largely indirect, such as observed homing to spawning sites or development of olfactory structures during suspected imprinting periods ( Horrall, 1981 ; Cathcart, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%