2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2012.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Olfactory changes after endoscopic sinus surgery in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our experience, VAS also significantly decreased after ESS both in the ECRS group and no-ECRS group [36]. Thus, our ESS showed favorable results for CRS patients refractory to medical therapies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our experience, VAS also significantly decreased after ESS both in the ECRS group and no-ECRS group [36]. Thus, our ESS showed favorable results for CRS patients refractory to medical therapies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Olfactory tests were performed using the T&T olfactometer and intravenous olfaction test, both of which are covered by health insurance and are commonly used for olfactory examination in our country [36]. The T&T olfactory test consists of 5 odorants: (i) β-phenylethyl alcohol, which smells like a rose; (ii) methyl cyclopentenolone, which smells like burning; (iii) isovaleric acid, which smells like sweat; (iv) γ-undecalactone, which smells like fruit; and (v) skatole, which smells like garbage (Takasago Industry Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As postoperative treatment, medical therapy with antibiotics, mucinolytics, antiallergic agents, and nasal irrigation with saline was performed for each patient until the postoperative sinonasal mucosal condition had stabilized, as we reported previously [15]. Postoperative intranasal findings were evaluated using the endoscopic score (E score) [16].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis is unique in that it represents the only prospective, multi-institutional, comparative effectiveness study. Prior study of CRS and olfaction is predominantly prospective cohort studies that lack a medical control arm [32][33][34] or do not conform to current treatment protocols [35]. There are two important caveats to place on these results.…”
Section: Clinical Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%