Olfactory sensitivity for putrefaction-associated thiols and indols in three species of non-human primate

Abstract

SUMMARY Using a conditioning paradigm, the olfactory sensitivity of four spider monkeys, three squirrel monkeys and three pigtail macaques to four thiols and two indols, substances characteristic of putrefaction processes and faecal odours, was assessed. With all odorants, the animals significantly discriminated concentrations below 1 p.p.m. (part per million) from the odourless solvent, and in several cases individual animals even demonstrated thresholds below 1 p.p.t. (part per trillion). The detection thresholds of 0.03 p.p.t. for indol in Saimiri sciureus and Macaca nemestrina and 0.96 p.p.t. for ethanethiol in Ateles geoffroyirepresent the lowest values among the more than 50 odorants tested so far with these species and are in the same order of magnitude as the lowest detection thresholds reported so far in the rat and the mouse. The results showed (a)all three species of non-human primate to have a highly developed olfactory sensitivity for putrefaction-associated odorants, and (b) a significant correlation between perceptibility in terms of olfactory detection threshold and carbon chain length of the thiols, and a marked effect of the presence vs absence of a methyl group on perceptibility of the indols tested in two of the three species. The results support the hypotheses that (a)between-species differences in neuroanatomical or genetic features may not be indicative of olfactory sensitivity, and (b) within-species differences in olfactory sensitivity may reflect differences in the behavioural relevance of odorants.

The microbiota-gut-brain axis: neurobehavioral correlates, health and sociality

“…Indeed, research on primates suggests that greater modularity or greater structuring of social groups reduces parasite success (Griffin and Nunn, 2011). Moreover, indirect mechanisms of transmission allow subjects to exert at least three strategies for selection of the microbial load transmitted: first, one focused on the conditions or characteristics of the objects exchanged (i.e., the spoilage of food) allows subjects to decide whether a particular item deserves further processing or not (Laska et al, 2007); second, subjects may directly assess the phenotypical-characteristics of the interacting subjects, deciding whether to engage in social interaction or not. For example, by stressing immigrants in order to “test” whether they carry pathogens before allowing their full integration into a group (Freeland, 1976); third, certain species may apply a posteriori mechanisms for the elimination of pathogens like zoopharmacognosy (Huffman, 1997).…”

The role of metals in mammalian olfaction of low molecular weight organosulfur compounds

“…Morton points out that sulfur “has a rich oxidation chemistry in the presence of air, which produces impurities that have a characteristic stench. The reader can confirm the effect of these impurities by contrasting commercial dimethyl sulfide with a sample that has been freshly washed with saturated aqueous mercuric chloride to remove di- and polysulfides and mercaptans!” 46 It is probable that dimethyl sulfide-d 6 was more highly purified than the normal istopologue and thus could have a different odor; this possibility was not considered when the odors were compared. 27c …”

Olfactory Sensitivity in Mammalian Species

“…An animal's sense of smell enables the animal to recognize and discriminate numerous airborne molecules with great accuracy and sensitivity (Wu et al 2011). The behavioral relevance of an odorant may be an important determinant of a species' olfactory sensitivity (Laska et al 2005a, 2007a, Olsson and Laska 2010, Ferdenzi et al 2013. It has also been determined that olfactory acuity increases during fasting, allowing some mammalian species to detect food and environmental odors, such as those of predators, more easily (Aime et al 2007).…”