Oligarki Dalam Demokrasi Indonesia

Koho, Intan Rachmina

doi:10.58872/lensa.v15i1.6

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Berbagai kampanye yang disajikan kepada masyarakat menampilkan berbagai hal yang bohong serta menjelek-jelekkan lawan dengan berbagai berita palsu. Bahkan partai politik hanya mendekati rakyat hanya untuk mendapatkan suara dalam pemilu (Koho, 2021).…”

Section: Hasil Dan Pembahasanunclassified

Oligarki dalam Demokrasi serta Prakteknya dalam Politik Hukum Indonesia

Budi

2024

JSA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Oligarchy, or political domination by a small number of individuals or groups, has become a concern in the context of democracy. The existence and practices of oligarchy can have significant implications for the formation of legal policy and the distribution of justice. The aim of this research is to investigate the concept of oligarchy in democracy, as well as analyze how oligarchy is practiced in Indonesian legal politics. This study used qualitative research methods. The data collection technique in this research is literature study. The data that has been collected is then analyzed in three stages, namely data reduction, data presentation and drawing conclusions. The research results show that the concept of oligarchy in democracy refers to a political system in which political power is concentrated in the hands of a small group of individuals, often having close relationships with certain politicians and supporters. Oligarchy management in Indonesian legal politics is carried out through oligarchic political practices carried out by an elite group consisting of politicians, businessmen and military figures who hold power. This oligarchic political practice does not occur without reason, because indirectly, several legal provisions in Indonesia actually extend political domination that should be democratic. This situation makes it difficult to avoid oligarchic politics in Indonesia.

show abstract

Section: Hasil Dan Pembahasanunclassified

Oligarki dalam Demokrasi serta Prakteknya dalam Politik Hukum Indonesia

Budi

2024

JSA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The presidential threshold impedes ‘newcomers’ (see Table 3) and secures the oligarchs’ domination in gaining advantages in elections (e.g. Katz and Mair, 1993, 1995, 2009; Wiwoho, 2021).…”

Section: Case Analysis: Election Act 7/2017mentioning

confidence: 99%

The intervention of oligarchy in the Indonesian legislative process

Tambunan

2023

Asian Journal of Comparative Politics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Contemporary scholarship suggests that in post-Soeharto Indonesia, politics have become more democratic, replacing a brutal military dictatorship with considerable autocratic governance that appears to value a democratic governance system. However, exactly why there has not been an actual change in democratic policy-making in the parliament remains poorly understood. Contemporary scholarship asserts that the Indonesian policy-making process is characterized by ‘empty ritual’ instead of a genuine political process, due to the oligarchic nature of Indonesian politics. Nonetheless, there are few explanations of how or to what extent oligarchy dictates the policy-making process at the legislative level; instead, we are left with an unclear picture of the current political process of policy-making in the parliament. This study aims to fill this gap and investigate how oligarchy has used cartel-like strategies to overcome the legislative process in the parliament. A literature review and analysis of secondary data sources were employed to answer these questions. The findings show that the persistence of oligarchic cartels is evident in the legislative process of the Election Act 7/2017. This suggests that Indonesian oligarchs have hijacked the parliament's democratic policy-making process, finding ways to achieve consensus in passing bills and thereby evading complex disputes to dictate policy to their economic and political benefit.

show abstract

“…Banyak negara-negara yang sedang berkembangan tidak menerapkan sistem demokratisasi yang baik. Penguasa cenderung menganut oligarki politik (Koho 2021).…”

Section: Politik Pertanian DI Indonesiaunclassified

Studi Komparasi Hukum Pertanahan Indonesia Dengan Pandangan Abu ‘Ubaid Al Qasim Bin Salam

Yasin

2021

qonuni

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis kebijakan pemerintah tentang pertanahan dan lahan perkebunan di Indonesia dibandingkan dengan pandangan/pemikiran Abu Ubaid mengenai tanah/ lahan perkebunan. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa terdapat persamaan dan perbedaan. Persamaannya yaitu, pada hal pendistribusian lahan pertanian, di Indonesia kepemilikan lahan diakui, adanya sertifikasi lahan pertanian bukti pengakuan atas hak milik lahan. Perbedaan pemikiran Abu ‘Ubaid ada pada pandangannya tentang lahan mati maksimal 3 tahun, bila dibiarkan negara dapat mengalihkan hak kepemilikannya kepada pihak lain yang bersedia untuk menghidupkan/menyuburkan kembali lahan tersebut. Di Indonesia tanah yang mati atau tidak dikelola bukan kewanangan pemerintah untuk mengatur lahan mati dan tidak ada batasan waktunya. Di Indonesia juga tidak membatasi kepemilikan hak atas tanah, sehingga pihak yang memiliki modal besar akan dengan leluasa mendapatkanya.

show abstract

Oligarki Dalam Demokrasi Indonesia

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

Oligarki dalam Demokrasi serta Prakteknya dalam Politik Hukum Indonesia

Oligarki dalam Demokrasi serta Prakteknya dalam Politik Hukum Indonesia

The intervention of oligarchy in the Indonesian legislative process

Studi Komparasi Hukum Pertanahan Indonesia Dengan Pandangan Abu ‘Ubaid Al Qasim Bin Salam

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About