2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-016-2986-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Olive Oil for Dressing Plant Leaves so as to Avoid O3 Injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
4
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data of CI, GR, ECI, ECD and AD were not satisfactorily fit to Gaussian distribution and therefore were subjected to a Box-Cox power transformation (Box and Cox 1964), as described by Agathokleous et al (2016b). Data of each response variable were subjected to repeated measures Analysis of Variances (rANOVAs) where Instar was the within-subjects factor with 6 levels and O 3 the categorical predictor with 2 levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data of CI, GR, ECI, ECD and AD were not satisfactorily fit to Gaussian distribution and therefore were subjected to a Box-Cox power transformation (Box and Cox 1964), as described by Agathokleous et al (2016b). Data of each response variable were subjected to repeated measures Analysis of Variances (rANOVAs) where Instar was the within-subjects factor with 6 levels and O 3 the categorical predictor with 2 levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For statistically significant linear contrasts, the effect magnitude of EOZ was calculated using a bias-corrected Cohen's δ (Hedges and Olkin 1985;Cohen 1988), as described previously (Agathokleous et al 2016c). The effects were converted into percentile gain, which appeared in the experimental condition using the Cohen's U 3 index (Cohen 1977); δ was converted to the overlapping coefficient (OVL) (Reiser and Faraggi 1999) [1.50-3.00)], or large (δ = 3.00+) (Cohen 1988;Agathokleous et al, 2016b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unbiased Cohen's δ was estimated based on balanced real replicates (Hedges and Olkin 1985) so as to quantify the magnitude of difference when the predictor was statistically significant. For covariate-adjusted response variables, δ was estimated by subtracting the baseline effect from the post-treatment effect (Agathokleous et al 2016c). Estimations of δ were calculated according to Agathokleous et al (2016bAgathokleous et al ( , 2016c…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%