2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.pupt.2015.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Omalizumab for severe allergic asthma in clinical trials and real-life studies: What we know and what we should address

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
19
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of efficacy, our findings were consistent with literature (10)(11)(12)(13)(14). While only 11.1% of our patients did not benefit from the treatment, 88.9% were benefited.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In terms of efficacy, our findings were consistent with literature (10)(11)(12)(13)(14). While only 11.1% of our patients did not benefit from the treatment, 88.9% were benefited.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This study showed that long-term omalizumab administration was well tolerated in our patients, and it was safe and effective. In earlier studies and reviews, omalizumab treatment has proven to be effective and safe in severe allergic asthmatic cases (10)(11)(12). However, there were few studies on this subject in Turkey (13,14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, Omalizumab (Xolair®) is a recombinant DNA-derived humanized monoclonal antibody indicated as an add-on therapy in patients aged ≥ 6 years with severe persistent allergic asthma uncontrolled at treatment step 4 or 5 according to guidelines GINA (2). Omalizumab demonstrated to be efficacious both in adults and children (3)(4)(5). In particular, in real-life studies, anti-IgE therapy showed short-and long-term benefits in terms of improving lung function and quality of life, achieving asthma control and reducing symptomatology, severe exacerbations, healthcare resource utilizations, hospitalizations, emergency department visits and reducing or discontinuing other asthma medications thus confirming, complementing, and extending evidence from randomized trials (3,5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The results are consistent with the efficacy and safety profile of omalizumab as observed in RCTs. However, the comparative analysis between RCTs and real-life studies highlighted the need for further research, particularly into the long-term effects of omalizumab [30], since most previous real-life studies reflect a clinical observation lasting < 2 years in a relatively limited number of patients [11-29]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%