A recent meta-analytic review by Shields,
Sazma, & Yonelinas (2016) brings to the fore several
conceptual issues within the stress and executive function (EF) literatures. We
present a critique of these issues, using the review as an exemplar of how
stress and EF are often examined empirically. The review summarizes research
suggesting that EF is not only trait-like, but can be also state-like,
influenced by factors such as acute stress. It has numerous strengths including
its scope in examining EF across domains, inclusion of moderators, and
timeliness, given the rapidly expanding field of stress research. We argue that
the conclusions would be less equivocal with a more precise and
neurally-informed consideration of EF, stressor, and timing assessments. A
detailed discussion of these issues is provided, using the inhibition EF domain
as an example, in order to illustrate key limitations and potential consequences
of broad inclusion criteria. We endeavor to promote precise, shared definitions
in the service of delineating a more complete and consistent account of acute
stress effects on EF.