2021
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.0824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Omega-3 Fatty Acids Effect on Major Cardiovascular Events in Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings of the overall REDUCE‐IT trial and this present analysis contrast sharply with neutral results from other contemporary clinical trials of moderate‐to high‐dose omega‐3 fatty acid supplementation, such as the recent STRENGTH (Long‐Term Outcomes Study to Assess Statin Residual Risk With Epanova in High Cardiovascular Risk Patients With Hypertriglyceridemia) and OMEMI (The Omega‐3 Fatty Acids in Elderly with Myocardial Infarction) trials. 34 , 35 , 36 As well, older clinical trials have shown mixed results with respect to prevention of MACE events. 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 In contrast, EPA in a highly purified form has shown a 19% benefit with respect to MACE in the open‐label JELIS (Japan EPA Lipid Intervention Study) at 1.8 g per day and a 25% reduction in MACE at 4 g per day in REDUCE‐IT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings of the overall REDUCE‐IT trial and this present analysis contrast sharply with neutral results from other contemporary clinical trials of moderate‐to high‐dose omega‐3 fatty acid supplementation, such as the recent STRENGTH (Long‐Term Outcomes Study to Assess Statin Residual Risk With Epanova in High Cardiovascular Risk Patients With Hypertriglyceridemia) and OMEMI (The Omega‐3 Fatty Acids in Elderly with Myocardial Infarction) trials. 34 , 35 , 36 As well, older clinical trials have shown mixed results with respect to prevention of MACE events. 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 In contrast, EPA in a highly purified form has shown a 19% benefit with respect to MACE in the open‐label JELIS (Japan EPA Lipid Intervention Study) at 1.8 g per day and a 25% reduction in MACE at 4 g per day in REDUCE‐IT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early studies in patients treated with EPA demonstrated reduced plaque volume, decreased inflammation, increased nitric oxide release, and higher rates of membrane stabilization. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] In light of these positive findings, the Reduction of Cardiovascular Events with Icosapent Ethyl (IPE) -Intervention Trial (REDUCE-IT) was designed to explore, in a randomized fashion, the role of IPE in reducing adverse cardiovascular events and whether it too could mitigate ischemic risk to the degree IPE had done in JELIS. 16 The results of the trial were overwhelmingly positive, and since the original publication of the trial, there have been a myriad of subsequent analyses confirming the benefit of IPE in various patient groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AQUAMARINE EPA/DHA randomized study was the first prospective and serial CMR study to investigate the antiatherogenic effect of EPA/DHA events under statin Regarding this contradiction in results between these studies, there has been much debate [12][13][14][15] , such as differences in the action of EPA and EPA/DHA, differences in the severity of participants between these studies, and the difference the value of high-dose EPA for the preventive treatment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease 3, 4) . However, the recently published STRENGTH study showed inconsistent results with no additional preventive effect with 4-g EPA/DHA on cardiovascular The comparisons of the group data (D) show that there were no significant differences in absolute changes in the PMR in the total lesion analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%