2017
DOI: 10.4103/jrms.jrms_644_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Omega-3 supplementation effects on polycystic ovary syndrome symptoms and metabolic syndrome

Abstract: Background:Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common female endocrine disorder with unknown etiology and with different complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of omega-3 supplementation on PCOS symptoms and metabolic syndrome.Materials and Methods:This double-blind clinical trial was performed in 2015 in Alzahra and Shahid Beheshti Hospitals, Isfahan, Iran, on 88 patients with PCOS. Intervention group took omega-3 supplements with dose of 2 g/day for 6 months (two capsules), … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the 9 included RCTs, four studies [ 18 , 26 – 28 ] adopted unclear randomization procedures, while the others described adequate methods of random sequence generation: the block randomization procedure [ 25 ], website [ 17 ], random-maker software “random allocation” [ 8 ] or computer-generated randomization list [ 19 , 20 ]; we rated the five studies as having an unclear risk of bias, while the others trials were at low risk of bias. We rated three trials [ 8 , 17 , 25 ] as having an unclear risk of bias because they did not describe an acceptable method of allocation concealment; because of that the others [ 19 , 20 , 26 – 28 ] described that drugs in trial groups and control groups were similar in shape, size and so on that the patients and researcher were not aware until the end of the analysis, we rated them as having a low risk of bias. For participant and outcome assessment blinding, five trials were unclear [ 17 – 20 , 26 ], but they used objective measures (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Among the 9 included RCTs, four studies [ 18 , 26 – 28 ] adopted unclear randomization procedures, while the others described adequate methods of random sequence generation: the block randomization procedure [ 25 ], website [ 17 ], random-maker software “random allocation” [ 8 ] or computer-generated randomization list [ 19 , 20 ]; we rated the five studies as having an unclear risk of bias, while the others trials were at low risk of bias. We rated three trials [ 8 , 17 , 25 ] as having an unclear risk of bias because they did not describe an acceptable method of allocation concealment; because of that the others [ 19 , 20 , 26 – 28 ] described that drugs in trial groups and control groups were similar in shape, size and so on that the patients and researcher were not aware until the end of the analysis, we rated them as having a low risk of bias. For participant and outcome assessment blinding, five trials were unclear [ 17 – 20 , 26 ], but they used objective measures (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five RCTs [ 8 , 17 , 20 , 25 , 28 ] reported the change of HOMA at the end of treatment. Due to the low heterogeneity, we used fix effect model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations