“…When we compared our results with other on-the-job measurement instruments such as the Work Limitation Questionnaire (WLQ) (Tamminga et al, 2014), the Work Role Functioning Questionnaire (WRFQ) (Abma, van der Klink, & Bultmann, 2013), and various atwork productivity measures (Beaton et al, 2016), we found similar or slightly better responsiveness and interpretability scores for the QWLQ-CS. For instance, responsiveness of the WLQ among cancers survivors showed an AUC of 0.68, with an SDC_group of 3.0 and a MIC of 2.9, whereas for the WRFQ an SDC_group of 5.8 (calculated based on their SEM) and an MIC of 9.0 were found (Ramada et al, 2014).…”