2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2013.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ommaya reservoir infections: A 16-year retrospective analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
51
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been few publications that have reviewed infection rates when accessing a shunt or reservoir in the published literature [4,5,[16][17][18][19] . Of the studies performed, there is conflicting data regarding the introduction of infection when tapping a shunt or VAD with infection rates ranging from 0 to 21.8% [4,5,[16][17][18][19] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There have been few publications that have reviewed infection rates when accessing a shunt or reservoir in the published literature [4,5,[16][17][18][19] . Of the studies performed, there is conflicting data regarding the introduction of infection when tapping a shunt or VAD with infection rates ranging from 0 to 21.8% [4,5,[16][17][18][19] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the studies performed, there is conflicting data regarding the introduction of infection when tapping a shunt or VAD with infection rates ranging from 0 to 21.8% [4,5,[16][17][18][19] . At the Children's Orthopedic Hospital Seattle, Dinndorf and Bleyer [16] reported a low risk of infection with repeated tapping of VADs for delivery of intraventricular chemotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Circumventing the BBB with local drug delivery increases the amount of drug at the target site, reducing systemic exposure and the risk of systemic toxicity. Clinical methods administer drugs by intracerebroventricular or intracortical infusion through a catheter (the Ommaya reservoir; Mead et al, 2014). These routes are fraught with issues, as fluid injection into the small ventricular spaces increases intracranial pressure and has been associated with hemorrhage, leakage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and infection (Misra et al, 2003;Mead et al, 2014).…”
Section: Types Of Biomaterials Used In the Brainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical methods administer drugs by intracerebroventricular or intracortical infusion through a catheter (the Ommaya reservoir; Mead et al, 2014). These routes are fraught with issues, as fluid injection into the small ventricular spaces increases intracranial pressure and has been associated with hemorrhage, leakage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and infection (Misra et al, 2003;Mead et al, 2014). Additionally, there is evidence that administration of drug into the CSF does not necessarily increase drug transport into the brain parenchyma (Pardridge, 2011).…”
Section: Types Of Biomaterials Used In the Brainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one retrospective study of 616 patients who had Ommaya reservoirs implanted, 34 patients were identified as having infections. [67] Perioperative infections were diagnosed in 32% of these patients, whereas the remainder were attributed to faulty aseptic technique when the reservoir was accessed. Ommaya reservoirs were present in these patients for a median of 316 days and the infection rate was 0.74 infections per 10,000 "Ommaya days".…”
Section: Nosocomial Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%