1996
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-34945-9_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OMT, Bridging the Gap between Analysis and Design

Abstract: This paper presents OMT*, a formal variant of OMT (Object Modeling Technique) designed to bridge the gap between analysis and design. OMT* is a partial result from a larger research effort proposing an integrated methodology and toolset based on the combination of Object-Orientation and Formal-Description Techniques. In this project OMT is used as the systems requirements analysis technique while SDL (Specification and Description Language) is targeted for the design phase. OMT* is defined by its abstract synt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Obviously, we can find in the literature other significant reports describing lessons learnt from real experiences (Hao et al, 2000;Holzmann, 1994;Jonkers et al, 1995;Nieh and Tavares, 1992), proposing general guidelines to assist the system engineer when considering a formal approach to design (Easterbrook and Callahan, 1997;Holloway, 1997;Holloway and Butler, 1996;Steinert and Roessler, 2000), or discussing case studies (Bieber, 1996;Butler et al, 1998;Hao et al, 2000;Haxthausen and Peleska, 2000;Holzmann, 1994;Leduc et al, 1996), to cite just a few.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Obviously, we can find in the literature other significant reports describing lessons learnt from real experiences (Hao et al, 2000;Holzmann, 1994;Jonkers et al, 1995;Nieh and Tavares, 1992), proposing general guidelines to assist the system engineer when considering a formal approach to design (Easterbrook and Callahan, 1997;Holloway, 1997;Holloway and Butler, 1996;Steinert and Roessler, 2000), or discussing case studies (Bieber, 1996;Butler et al, 1998;Hao et al, 2000;Haxthausen and Peleska, 2000;Holzmann, 1994;Leduc et al, 1996), to cite just a few.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%