“…[13] However,t he results in Table 1d emonstratedt hat the actual reactions toichiometry is 0.62 to 0.91 in the EDA + EGs systems, probably because someE DA amino groups and EGs hydroxyl groups are inaccessible to CO 2 molecules under atmosphericp ressure. Most importantly,t he actual reaction stoichiometry is 1.13 in the aqueous PCO 2 SM solution with about 0.42 mol EDA/L (Figure 3), whereas ap reviousr eport indicatedt hat one mole of DBU consumes 1.04 to 1.11moles of CO 2 , [14] suggesting that our systemsp ossessr emarkable reac- www.chemphyschem.org tivity and superior absorption capacity.A tt he same time, the loading performance of CO 2 in variousa queous alkanolamines was presented in the previous work, [15] which included MEA (0.4628), DEA (0.2360), TEA (0.1944), MAE (0.6510), and AMP (0.8590) mol CO 2 per mol amine. By contrast, this paper reports an ovel CO 2 absorption system, whichh as higherC O 2 loading capacity.…”