On 3D printed biomedical sensors for non-enzymatic glucose sensing applications

Kumar, Vinay; Singh, Rupinder; Kumar, Ranvijay

doi:10.1177/09544119221100116

Cited by 18 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…3D printing can also be used to print certain electronics to be added to the drug delivery devices. 3D printed electronics such as biological sensors which can measure glucose, temperature and sweat can be printed [68][69][70]. The desired design can also be directly printed into or onto the device [71].…”

Section: Future Perspectives and Conclusionmentioning

confidence: 99%

3D Printing in Triggered Drug Delivery Devices: A Review

Cheung

Lee

et al. 2022

Biomedical Materials & Devices

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Triggered drug delivery devices use external stimulus to trigger the release of the drugs from the device. By controlling the exposure of the stimuli, it would allow for the control over the timing, duration and amount of drug being released from the device, improving drug efficacy. 3D printing uses on-demand deposition and crosslinking of materials to fabricate a product, increasing the customisability of the design and internal structure. By using 3D printing to fabricate triggered drug delivery devices, certain advantages such as complex geometries, gradient compositions, multi-material structures and embedded components can be conferred to the printed devices. In this review paper, triggered drug delivery devices which are fabricated using 3D printing techniques such as vat photopolymerisation and material extrusion are discussed. The advancement in certain areas of 3D printing, such as in multi-material 3D printing and hybrid additive manufacturing, which presents tremendous opportunities for fabricating future triggered drug delivery devices will also be reviewed.

show abstract

Section: Future Perspectives and Conclusionmentioning

confidence: 99%

3D Printing in Triggered Drug Delivery Devices: A Review

Cheung

Lee

et al. 2022

Biomedical Materials & Devices

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…7 Traditionally, surgical implants made of diverse materials such as metals, ceramics, and polymers have been used to treat orthopedic diseases. 8 To meet orthopedic criteria, the materials must have a variety of qualities, including biocompatibility, mechanical capabilities, and antibacterial efficacy. 9 HAp is a widely utilized biomaterial with prospective uses in clinical dentistry, tissue engineering, orthopedics, and maxillofacial surgery due to its strong bioactivity, biocompatibility, and osteoconductive qualities.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

On PVDF composite as partially absorbable smart implants

Husain

Singh

Pabla

2023

Proc Inst Mech Eng H

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

For various orthopedic needs, several studies have been testified on non-absorbable implants, prepared with different metals/alloys, and composites. But yet little has been stated on the partially absorbable smart implants of thermoplastic composites for online health monitoring of veterinary patients. This article highlights the in-house development of affordable, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) composite-based partially absorbable smart implants (with online sensing capability) for orthopedic needs in canines. Hydroxyapatite (HAp) and chitosan (CS) nanoparticles were reinforced in the PVDF matrix by a melt processing route with various weight proportions (wt.%) to fabricate a partially absorbable smart implant for the canine. The study suggests that the 8.0 wt.% HAp and 2.0 wt.% CS in PVDF is the superlative composition/proportion of reinforcement for preparing feedstock stock filaments (for 3D printing of partially absorbable smart implants), based on rheological, mechanical, thermal, dielectric, and voltage-current-resistance ( V- I- R) characteristics. For the selected composition/proportion of PVDF composite, acceptable mechanical properties (such as modulus of toughness (MoT) 2.0 MPa, Young’s modulus (E) 889 MPa), and dielectric properties (dielectric constant (ε r) 9.6 at room temperature (30°C) and 20 MHz) for online sensing capabilities (for health monitoring) was observed. The results are braced by attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) analysis.

show abstract

“…Various non‐traditional fillers are also tried and tested as filler in dental composite which includes gypsum, marble dust, glass ionomer cement etc. [1–4]. Glass ionomer itself is used as dental restorative material and its use in the polymeric based dental composite has also investigated by various researcher.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative investigation of fabrication, roughness, mechanical and wear properties of glass ionomer and nanofillers reinforced dental composite: A review

Verma

Azam

Kumar

2023

Materialwissenschaft Werkst

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the present study, comparative analysis of glass ionomer and nanofillers in the performance of dental composite has been reviewed. In dental composite, a number of particulate fillers specifically nanoparticle are being tested and used. A new approach has been tried and investigated to replace expensive nanofillers with the other filler such as glass ionomer. There is a strong need to understand the scientific method, to conduct the clinical trial, and to perform the laboratory test to evaluate role of each parameter, constituent in the performance of dental composite. The present research reviewed the recent finding, possible opportunity and challenges for use of glass ionomer as replacement of nanofiller in dental composite. The existing literature on the favorable and non‐favorable side of glass ionomer is critically evaluated. The major aspect considered in the present review was to evaluate the surface roughness, mechanical properties and wear properties. The present article attempted to provide a state‐ of‐ the‐art analysis of fabrication method, surface treatment method and comparative analysis on role of particulate filler versus glass ionomer on the performance based on mechanical and wear testing mechanism.

show abstract

On 3D printed biomedical sensors for non-enzymatic glucose sensing applications

Cited by 18 publications

References 31 publications

3D Printing in Triggered Drug Delivery Devices: A Review

3D Printing in Triggered Drug Delivery Devices: A Review

On PVDF composite as partially absorbable smart implants

Comparative investigation of fabrication, roughness, mechanical and wear properties of glass ionomer and nanofillers reinforced dental composite: A review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About