2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfa.2021.108927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a categorical framework for classifying C⁎-dynamics up to cocycle conjugacy

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section we shall consider a slight variant of Szabó's approximate cocycle intertwining argument in [59] (see also [9]). Throughout this section, we assume that A and B are non-unital C * -algebras.…”
Section: Szabó's Approximate Cocycle Intertwining Argumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this section we shall consider a slight variant of Szabó's approximate cocycle intertwining argument in [59] (see also [9]). Throughout this section, we assume that A and B are non-unital C * -algebras.…”
Section: Szabó's Approximate Cocycle Intertwining Argumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 5.1. In [59], Szabó defined cocycle morphisms and proper cocycle morphisms for (twisted) group actions on C * -algebras. Furthermore, he provided a categorical framework for the classification of group actions on C * -algebras up to cocycle conjugacy.…”
Section: Szabó's Approximate Cocycle Intertwining Argumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the methodology of Izumi-Matui is closely tied to the Rokhlin property and the Evans-Kishimoto intertwining argument [12], it is increasingly difficult to implement for more complicated groups, and in fact is too restrictive for groups with torsion. Recently, the second named author proposed a categorical framework for C * -dynamics [52] to classify group actions up to cocycle conjugacy based on an Elliott intertwining argument that is intended to provide an alternative to the one of Evans-Kishimoto. In this framework, arrows between actions of C * -algebras are so-called cocycle morphisms. In analogy to ordinary C * -algebra classification, it is an important intermediate step to solve the uniqueness problem, i.e., to determine in terms of classifying invariants when two cocycle morphisms are approximately/asymptotically unitarily equivalent; for more details see [52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the second named author proposed a categorical framework for C * -dynamics [52] to classify group actions up to cocycle conjugacy based on an Elliott intertwining argument that is intended to provide an alternative to the one of Evans-Kishimoto. In this framework, arrows between actions of C * -algebras are so-called cocycle morphisms. In analogy to ordinary C * -algebra classification, it is an important intermediate step to solve the uniqueness problem, i.e., to determine in terms of classifying invariants when two cocycle morphisms are approximately/asymptotically unitarily equivalent; for more details see [52]. Since it was also argued that equivariant KK-theory can be viewed as a (bi-)functor on this enlarged category, it is natural expect that it ought to represent one of the key obstructions to solving said existence/uniqueness problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%