2013
DOI: 10.12988/ams.2013.38433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a competitive economic equilibrium referred to a continuous time period

Abstract: In this paper we present a dynamic version of Walrasian competitive equilibrium for a pure exchange economy: each consumer attains the optimal satiety when maximizes, under the budget constrain, the mean value of utility in a given period. Moreover, we give a motivation because the above dynamic equilibrium can not be characterized by using variational approach.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As said above our existence result on competitive equilibrium is general for the pure exchange economies because it includes the results in [1,2] and, probability, also the ones in [3,12] related to the dynamic case introduced in [11,13] if we replace the concavity condition with quasi-concavity condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…As said above our existence result on competitive equilibrium is general for the pure exchange economies because it includes the results in [1,2] and, probability, also the ones in [3,12] related to the dynamic case introduced in [11,13] if we replace the concavity condition with quasi-concavity condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Probably, our techniques also work if we consider the dynamic version of pure exchange economics introduced in [16,17] (see also [26,27]) and so the existing results of these papers could be improved by replacing the concavity condition with the quasiconcavity condition.…”
Section: Abstract and Applied Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, the finality of the strategy pursued by agents is finalized toward maximizing, under the constrains of budget, the mean value of the utility in the given period. Therefore, in respect of the above economic justification, the principal activities will be considered in terms of mean values and in force of condition 3), which permit us to justify that the non-production in mean value does not imply the non-production in any instant (fact inaccurately contradicted in the recent paper [17] and long before mentioned in [5,6,13,14,15,16] for supporting the existence of a dynamic equilibrium for a pure exchange economy over time and currently proved in [32]), we will define a new dynamic competitive equilibrium. Successively in Proposition 3.1, we will prove that such equilibrium, under some assumptions, satisfies Walras' law.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%