2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.laa.2020.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a conjecture concerning the Bruhat order

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But note that this is not true for A(R, S) in general. See [12] and some of its references for further information on this issue.…”
Section:  mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But note that this is not true for A(R, S) in general. See [12] and some of its references for further information on this issue.…”
Section:  mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Bruhat order on (0, 1)-matrices is receiving the attention of many researchers, [4,6,10,11,12,13,15,16,17,18,19]. In the recent years several authors have taken Brualdi and Hwang's ideas, and extended the Bruhat order to other classes of matrices than (0, 1)-matrices: the Bruhat order has been studied on the class of tournament matrices with a given score vector, [8], on the class of alternating sign matrices, [9], and on the class of doubly stochastic matrices, [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doing this they gave rise to two distinct partial order relations on A(R, S). In the last 16 years, many research have focused on several topics of these two partial order relations: conjectures [15], minimal elements [2,4,16], coincidence [12], chains and antichains [9,10,20,21], restrictions of the Bruhat order on subclasses of A(R, S) [8,11], or extensions of one of these orders to other classes of matrices distinct of A(R, S) [5,6,7,13,14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%