1972
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620040202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a direct‐iterative eigensolution technique

Abstract: Two variations of an iterative scheme are presented for the solution to algebraic eigensystems. These algorithms are used in conjunction with the method of reduced generalized co-ordinates so that n number of frequencies and mode shapes are obtained simultaneously. The bases of the scheme are the well-known results of Stodola-Vianello and Gram-Schmidt. Advantages of the present schemes are realized both in computational effort and in computer storage. Examples are presented to illustrate the convergence charac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The subscript j is introduced in anticipation of an iterative process, so that j = 1 holds presently for equation (6). The transformation T, must contain the essential capability of giving a relatively complete description in a mathematical sense of the subspace eigenbasis that is sought.…”
Section: Block-stodola Technique For Au = Abu With a And B Symmetricmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subscript j is introduced in anticipation of an iterative process, so that j = 1 holds presently for equation (6). The transformation T, must contain the essential capability of giving a relatively complete description in a mathematical sense of the subspace eigenbasis that is sought.…”
Section: Block-stodola Technique For Au = Abu With a And B Symmetricmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6) is equivalent to the solution of the standard eigenvalue problem Assume that M is positive definite, then if M = SST for any non-singular matrix S, the problem in equation g+ = u2+ (7) i( = S-lKS-T, $ = ST+ (8) where It is computationally efficient to use as S the Cholesky factor EM of My i.e. M = Z , E ' & .…”
Section: Transformation O F Generalized Eigenvalue Problem To Standarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When compounded, these can be represented by an n x m matrix U,, the orthogonality condition being Premultiplication u p 1 = I V, = AU, produces a set of vectors in which the components of all the dominant eigenvectors are magnified. The dominant eigenvalues are predicted from an interaction matrix of order m x m which could be B, = q V l = UTAU, (13) This matrix is also used to realign the trial vectors which, after being re-orthogonalized, can be adopted as the trial vectors for the second round of iteration.…”
Section: Simultaneous Iterationmentioning
confidence: 99%