1991
DOI: 10.1016/0022-314x(91)90032-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a family of cubics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These nontrivial solutions have been found by Lee [10], Mignotte and Tzanakis [15] in the rational case and by Ziegler [22] in the imaginary quadratic case (κ = ω 3 , ω 2 3 ). One might conjecture, as Thomas [19] did, that there are only trivial solutions, if deg κ > 0 but this is not true.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These nontrivial solutions have been found by Lee [10], Mignotte and Tzanakis [15] in the rational case and by Ziegler [22] in the imaginary quadratic case (κ = ω 3 , ω 2 3 ). One might conjecture, as Thomas [19] did, that there are only trivial solutions, if deg κ > 0 but this is not true.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…if d = 3 and p 1 = ±1. In this case there exist the non-trivial solutions (1, −(1 + p 2 (a))) respectively (3 + p 2 (a), −2 − p 2 (a)) found by Lee [10] respectively Mignotte and Tzanakis [15]. To the authors knowledge these are the only exceptions known yet in the case of rational integers and d = 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…All the examples treated in [4,6,8] fulfill the conditions above. Obviously, Lemma 1 does not depend on the special choice of δ 1 and δ 2 .…”
Section: The Computer Searchmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Apart from the result of Pethö [8] and the references therein, we mention the papers of Mignotte and Tzanakis [6], Lee [4] and Thomas [9]. We also refer to the paper of Mignotte [5], where he proved that for n ≥ 4, n ∈ Z, the diophantine equation…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…p 1 = 0, p 2 = 1 and deg p 3 ≥ 1, the assertion of the theorem is false since F a (p 3 − 3, p 3 − 2) = −1. See however Lee [11], Mignotte and Tzanakis [13], and Mignotte [12], where all solutions of this family are determined.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%