2006
DOI: 10.1007/bf03167501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a model of magnetization switching by spin-polarized current

Abstract: This paper is concerned with global existence of weak solutions to a model equations of magnetization reversal by spin-polarized current in a layer introduced in [19]. The local magnetization of the ferromagnet satisfies the usual Landau-Lifshitz equation which is coupled to the nonlinear heat equation satisfied by the spin accumulation field defined in all the layer. The coupling is due to the contact interaction energy. We use an hyperbolic regularization method with penalization of the saturation constraint… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model we are interested in in this article has already been studied in previous works. There are several papers concerning theoretical results (existence of solutions); see for instance [5,4]. On numerical aspects, we would like to mention the works done by Garcia-Cervera, Wang, and E, [3,12].…”
Section: Numerical Comparison Between the Approximate Models And The Fullmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model we are interested in in this article has already been studied in previous works. There are several papers concerning theoretical results (existence of solutions); see for instance [5,4]. On numerical aspects, we would like to mention the works done by Garcia-Cervera, Wang, and E, [3,12].…”
Section: Numerical Comparison Between the Approximate Models And The Fullmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea is to rewrite, by using the saturation constraint (4), the LLG equation (1) Note that this method has been used in [10,11] and may be applied to some classes of generalized problems.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11 Using Hyperbolic Regularizationmentioning
confidence: 99%