2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnt.2016.09.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a mollifier of the perturbed Riemann zeta-function

Abstract: The mollification ζ(s) + ζ (s) put forward by Feng is computed by analytic methods coming from the techniques of the ratios conjectures of L-functions. The current situation regarding the percentage of non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta-function on the critical line is then clarified.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bui et al [6] were able to get 41.05%. Feng [16] claimed a value of 41.27%, though this was contested in [5,19,24], and reduced to 41.07% due to an incomplete claim on the error terms.…”
Section: Application To Critical Zerosmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Bui et al [6] were able to get 41.05%. Feng [16] claimed a value of 41.27%, though this was contested in [5,19,24], and reduced to 41.07% due to an incomplete claim on the error terms.…”
Section: Application To Critical Zerosmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[1,3,7,8,21]. The applications of I are very deep, as one may use asymptotic estimates for I to make sense of the distribution of values of L-functions, the location of their critical zeros, as well as upper and lower bounds for the size of L-functions (see, among many examples, [9][10][11]16,19,23,24]). As often stressed, one key aspect to obtaining good results is to make sure that θ be as large as possible.…”
Section: Let A(s) Be the Dirichlet Polynomialmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is possible that Feng and Wu's result λ > 3.072 can also be obtained just assuming the Riemann hypothesis. For another application of Feng's mollifier, see [8] and the references therein.…”
Section: Theorem 1 Assume the Riemann Hypothesis Then We Havementioning
confidence: 99%