1983
DOI: 10.1007/bf01388436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a new characterization of Demuskin groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Dummit and Labute (see [3]), Iwasawa observed that pro-p groups that belong to the class E n for a fixed positive integer n have interesting representation-theoretic properties and he raised the question of determining those groups with n = 1. In [3] Dummit and Labute answered this question for 1-relator groups in the case n = 2. Actually they proved that G is a Demushkin group if and only if G is a one relator group and G ∈ E 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Dummit and Labute (see [3]), Iwasawa observed that pro-p groups that belong to the class E n for a fixed positive integer n have interesting representation-theoretic properties and he raised the question of determining those groups with n = 1. In [3] Dummit and Labute answered this question for 1-relator groups in the case n = 2. Actually they proved that G is a Demushkin group if and only if G is a one relator group and G ∈ E 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is totally decomposed in the extension L'/L^a simple calcu- The result now follows from the main theorem of [2]. We show that, if C p eL and the group Gal(L(p)/L ao ) is nontrivial, then it is a Demushkin group.…”
Section: Proofs Of the Main Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In the proof of Theorem 1 we cited [DuLa,Theorem 1] (N, F p ) in the case of strongly regular not totally degenerate p-quaternionic pairings. There is some additional interest in this formulation because p-quaternionic pairings which are strongly regular but not weakly p-local have been abstractly constructed (see [Ku2,Theorem 9]), and it is not known whether these pairings are realizable as γ F for suitable fields F .…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 98%